From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam and godi
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:46:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130722074657.GB10640@notk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ECE0D1.8040800@riken.jp>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Francois Berenger wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 03:55 PM, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> > Looking only at the number of packages available in the repositories,
> >Opam has around 400 packages while Godi has around 170 packages. Also,
> >Opam can use "aspcud" to compute the minimal number of changes when
> >installing/updating, which can make a big difference when dependency
> >constraints between packages become hard to solve. I also like the
> >interface "à la apt-get", compared to the curses interface that I used
> >with Godi.
>
> I also like the apt-get/aptitude style of OPAM command lines.
>
> As an impatient user, I also feel that OPAM is way faster than GODI.
As far as I can tell, godi_console is now a native-compiled executable
while it used to be byte-compiled before.
This has made it *WAY* faster (at least 5 times faster according to my
testing earlier). I really hated these 10-15 seconds of waiting.
--
Adrien Nader
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51E40425.8060604@libertysurf.fr>
2013-07-15 14:20 ` [Caml-list] ocaml glade gtk3 r.3
2013-07-15 19:18 ` Martin DeMello
2013-07-19 17:22 ` [Caml-list] opam and godi r.3
2013-07-21 13:54 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-21 14:20 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2013-07-21 14:43 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-07-22 7:44 ` Adrien Nader
2013-07-22 13:30 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2013-07-22 8:06 ` Török Edwin
2013-07-22 12:20 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-22 12:55 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-22 18:30 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-07-22 13:51 ` David Scott
2013-07-22 6:55 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2013-07-22 7:35 ` Francois Berenger
2013-07-22 7:46 ` Adrien Nader [this message]
2013-07-22 12:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-22 7:20 ` Matthieu Dubuget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130722074657.GB10640@notk.org \
--to=adrien@notk.org \
--cc=berenger@riken.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).