From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien@notk.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EACC81798
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:46:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0JAFri7FFbeUeT/2dsb2JhbABagwaDJmm6NYJsBAGBDRZ0giQBAQUjDwFGEAsYAgIFEw4CAg8FGDGIJ6V3kH2BKI1XgRcHgl0zbgOXXAGRTYMUOg
X-IPAS-Result: Ar0JAFri7FFbeUeT/2dsb2JhbABagwaDJmm6NYJsBAGBDRZ0giQBAQUjDwFGEAsYAgIFEw4CAg8FGDGIJ6V3kH2BKI1XgRcHgl0zbgOXXAGRTYMUOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,717,1367964000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="21864451"
Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Jul 2013 09:46:58 +0200
Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id B6B28C009; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:46:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:46:57 +0200
From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20130722074657.GB10640@notk.org>
References: <CAFrFfuEU8qDDFZ4hoa02o8P=WfMtfQ1S5KwmazWMfQ4bnavd=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <383739793.214096184.1374254520546.JavaMail.root@zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net>
 <CAHvkLrMHZi-SCUPEM1VzZUnifEjBpLjt-Y1ycDR8sk4iExN-nA@mail.gmail.com>
 <51ECE0D1.8040800@riken.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <51ECE0D1.8040800@riken.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam and godi

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Francois Berenger wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 03:55 PM, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >   Looking only at the number of packages available in the repositories,
> >Opam has around 400 packages while Godi has around 170 packages. Also,
> >Opam can use "aspcud" to compute the minimal number of changes when
> >installing/updating, which can make a big difference when dependency
> >constraints between packages become hard to solve. I also like the
> >interface "à la apt-get", compared to the curses interface that I used
> >with Godi.
> 
> I also like the apt-get/aptitude style of OPAM command lines.
> 
> As an impatient user, I also feel that OPAM is way faster than GODI.

As far as I can tell, godi_console is now a native-compiled executable
while it used to be byte-compiled before.
This has made it *WAY* faster (at least 5 times faster according to my
testing earlier). I really hated these 10-15 seconds of waiting.

-- 
Adrien Nader