From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien@notk.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC77820A1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:24:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq0AAEH+L1JbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbhzq/PoEfFg4BAQEBAQgWBzyCJQEBBSNWEAsOCgICBRMOAgIPBRgxiBmwbZIJgSmNBIE5B4JpNIEAA5d3AZUUOoE1
X-IPAS-Result: Aq0AAEH+L1JbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbhzq/PoEfFg4BAQEBAQgWBzyCJQEBBSNWEAsOCgICBRMOAgIPBRgxiBmwbZIJgSmNBIE5B4JpNIEAA5d3AZUUOoE1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,882,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="32357920"
Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 07:24:36 +0200
Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 0FE5CC009; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:24:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:24:37 +0200
From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org>
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>
 <CAPzAKVCSHcYmiqb4BbDkjAnLUkMxTi5OYFYZAJ5YediFFBbv6Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPzAKVCSHcYmiqb4BbDkjAnLUkMxTi5OYFYZAJ5YediFFBbv6Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013, Paolo Donadeo wrote:
> GTK: my personal opinion is that it's an awful toolkit, from each and every
> point of view. Bad software design, horrible widgets, etc... The OCaml
> binding is probably (from the programmer point of view) *better* than the
> original C API, but it's still a pain.

I'm trying to get a list of things that people find bad in (labl)gtk.
Would you be able to put clear words on what you dislike?

I'm looking for input from anyone and you can mail me directly if you
don't want to flood the list (or send a message on IRC).

Thanks,
Adrien Nader