From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rixed@happyleptic.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE9F820A2
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=pra; client-ip=88.191.122.7;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=88.191.122.7;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@dagobah.securactive.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=88.191.122.7;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@dagobah.securactive.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak0FAFY1MFJYv3oH/2dsb2JhbABbgwfAdoJ8gRwWdIImAQU6TwshJQ8FKIg6wiuPbRaDB4EAA5d3kXODIg
X-IPAS-Result: Ak0FAFY1MFJYv3oH/2dsb2JhbABbgwfAdoJ8gRwWdIImAQU6TwshJQ8FKIg6wiuPbRaDB4EAA5d3kXODIg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,883,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="32397686"
Received: from dagobah.securactive.net ([88.191.122.7])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2013 11:23:04 +0200
Received: from rd1.labo.securactive.lan (backup.labo.securactive.lan [82.240.34.113])
	by dagobah.securactive.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145E265072
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ccellier.rd.securactive.lan (ccellier.rd.securactive.lan [192.168.10.9])
	by rd1.labo.securactive.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E21752C600D5
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:19:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1VJgdi-0007dV-EY
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:10 +0200
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:10 +0200
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20130911092310.GA28849@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan>
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>
 <522FC0C2.8080600@riken.jp>
 <20130911050753.GA22288@dell.happyleptic.org>
 <20130911102616.01772b9d@atmarama.noip.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130911102616.01772b9d@atmarama.noip.me>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

-[ Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:26:16AM +0200, Gour ]----
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:07:53 +0200
> I'm also curious what would hypothetical qt-server bring to OCaml users?

I used Qt a long time ago, and all I remember is the complex build system
with custom preprocessors pilled on top of C++. No wonder there is not
many bindings to Qt.

Something like Qt-server, ie. a C++ program linked with Qt, controlled by
stdin and obeying widget-related commands, would brings Qt bindings to many
other languages. I was unaware that what made gtk-server easy to write
was how easy it is to dynamically lookup function names.