From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84585820A1 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:25:09 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of gour@atmarama.net) identity=pra; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="gour@atmarama.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@plane.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="postmaster@plane.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqUDAIAoMFJQW+UDf2dsb2JhbABbgz+DNEfAWxYOAQELCwoIFCiCJQEBBAEjMh4LCwsaAgUhAgIPEhsbGYdwAwkKsCWISw2JP4Epi0+DC4JTgTQDjyyGY4FojECIVQ X-IPAS-Result: AqUDAIAoMFJQW+UDf2dsb2JhbABbgz+DNEfAWxYOAQELCwoIFCiCJQEBBAEjMh4LCwsaAgUhAgIPEhsbGYdwAwkKsCWISw2JP4Epi0+DC4JTgTQDjyyGY4FojECIVQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,883,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="26449055" Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 10:25:08 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VJfjT-0004L4-Qk for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:25:03 +0200 Received: from 78-1-240-181.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.240.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:25:03 +0200 Received: from gour by 78-1-240-181.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:25:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Gour Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:21:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20130911102148.1e201e24@atmarama.noip.me> References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me> <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-240-181.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.1 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Validation-by: gour@atmarama.net Subject: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:21:58 +0400 Kakadu wrote: > The idea behind lablqt it to generated some C++ code while programmer > will not be needed to look inside it. Also, lablqt is more oriented on > using QtQuick instead QtWidgets, so your argument about developing in > C++ is not so strong in case lablqt. I like idea of using QtQuick, but would also like that C++ code is absent or hidden for the user trying to use Qt5 with OCaml. Sincerely, Gour --=20 Whenever and wherever there is a decline in religious practice,=20 O descendant of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion =E2=80=94=20 at that time I descend Myself. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810