From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien@notk.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25D6820A1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:48:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8AAHK6MFJbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbgz+DfLxYgRwWDgEBAQEBCBYHPIIlAQEFI1YQCxgCAgUTDgICDwUYMYgZrjSRcwSBKY5BB4JpNIEAA5d4AZUWOg
X-IPAS-Result: Ap8AAHK6MFJbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbgz+DfLxYgRwWDgEBAQEBCBYHPIIlAQEFI1YQCxgCAgUTDgICDwUYMYgZrjSRcwSBKY5BB4JpNIEAA5d4AZUWOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,885,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="32484106"
Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 20:48:11 +0200
Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 490C5C01A; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:48:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:48:12 +0200
From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: 'Paolo Donadeo' <p.donadeo@gmail.com>,
	'OCaml mailing list' <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <20130911184812.GD3764@notk.org>
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>
 <CAPzAKVCSHcYmiqb4BbDkjAnLUkMxTi5OYFYZAJ5YediFFBbv6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org>
 <050401ceaeea$2259e4e0$670daea0$@ffconsultancy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <050401ceaeea$2259e4e0$670daea0$@ffconsultancy.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, Jon Harrop wrote:
> 
> Lack of Intellisense to explore the API is the main problem for me. After that, availability of samples to learn from.

Have you had a look at Merlin[1]?

I don't expect it to have the same level of refinement as Intellisense
but it should provide a strong improvement.
It's definitely recent though.

[1] https://github.com/def-lkb/merlin

-- 
Adrien Nader