From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien@notk.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66145820A1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:06:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8AAMe9MFJbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbgz+DfLxYgRwWDgEBAQEBCBYHPIIlAQEFI1YQCxgCAgUTDgICDwUYMROIBgiuL5F3gSmOQQeCaTSBAAOXeAGBL5NnOg
X-IPAS-Result: Ap8AAMe9MFJbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbgz+DfLxYgRwWDgEBAQEBCBYHPIIlAQEFI1YQCxgCAgUTDgICDwUYMROIBgiuL5F3gSmOQQeCaTSBAAOXeAGBL5NnOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,885,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="26528454"
Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 21:06:25 +0200
Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id D8B7DC009; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:06:24 +0200
From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: Gour <gour@atmarama.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20130911190624.GA14646@notk.org>
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>
 <522FC0C2.8080600@riken.jp>
 <20130911050753.GA22288@dell.happyleptic.org>
 <20130911102616.01772b9d@atmarama.noip.me>
 <20130911092310.GA28849@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan>
 <y2abo3z8qn8.fsf@kingston.cl.cam.ac.uk>
 <20130911145949.61fe3f17@atmarama.noip.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130911145949.61fe3f17@atmarama.noip.me>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, Gour wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:54:51 +0100
> Leo White <lpw25@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps Smoke (http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Languages/Smoke) is
> > similar.
> 
> When I was considering F# and Kyoto (Qt bindings), the main developer
> was complaining a lot about SMOKE (see
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings/7852 thread) and
> was considering to use SWIG for next generation of Qt bindings for F#.

I hope he didn't go that way.
The original SWIG developper ended up stating that he had made something
to mix python and C++ and that it had turned really awful. I can't find
the message again unfortunately (not enough keywords).

Summary: if you ever wonder why the swig-generated files take so long to
compile, stop at once, go get yourself a coffee or go do something,
anything, else.

-- 
Adrien Nader