From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien@notk.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E14F820A1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:15:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8AABvAMFJbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbgz+DfLxYgRwWDgEBAQEBCBYHPIIlAQEFI2YLGAICBRMOAgIPBRgxJwaHbAitepF6gSmOSIJpNIEAA5d4AZUWOg
X-IPAS-Result: Ap8AABvAMFJbeUeTl2dsb2JhbABbgz+DfLxYgRwWDgEBAQEBCBYHPIIlAQEFI2YLGAICBRMOAgIPBRgxJwaHbAitepF6gSmOSIJpNIEAA5d4AZUWOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,885,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="26528967"
Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 21:15:26 +0200
Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 6055CC009; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:15:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:15:26 +0200
From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <20130911191526.GA16599@notk.org>
References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me>
 <CAPzAKVCSHcYmiqb4BbDkjAnLUkMxTi5OYFYZAJ5YediFFBbv6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org>
 <CAPzAKVBcOvcHhM2j0=USaOX2c9Am=bOq0p-KoL=VcaQj0D7jpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130911185750.GE3764@notk.org>
 <CADU9VHuVb07pXpap-jR-CKr-XLA1FoqDT_Jo6ix+UFHH2ONTPw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADU9VHuVb07pXpap-jR-CKr-XLA1FoqDT_Jo6ix+UFHH2ONTPw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, Rudi Grinberg wrote:
> Also, it doesn't help that the GTK devs don't mind breaking themes every
> release.
> 
> http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/a-linux-conspiracy-theory
> 
> (Apologies in advance for the slightly inflammatory nature of that article)

Well, this matches pretty well what I said about the community being
fairly closed; it's difficult to be listened to when you're from quite
deeply involved with it.

-- 
Adrien Nader