From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A063E820A1 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of gour@atmarama.net) identity=pra; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="gour@atmarama.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@plane.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="postmaster@plane.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnkEAHnBMFJQW+UDf2dsb2JhbABbgz+DNb47Fg4BAQsLCggUKIIlAQEEATobHgsLCyElDy0bGRSHaArAAJAHhAcDjy2IS5UX X-IPAS-Result: AnkEAHnBMFJQW+UDf2dsb2JhbABbgz+DNb47Fg4BAQsLCggUKIIlAQEEATobHgsLCyElDy0bGRSHaArAAJAHhAcDjy2IS5UX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,885,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="32487110" Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 21:18:09 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VJpvV-0002S5-2E for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:18:09 +0200 Received: from 93-142-218-131.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.142.218.131]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:18:09 +0200 Received: from gour by 93-142-218-131.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:18:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Gour Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:17:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20130911211725.4bf25b35@atmarama.noip.me> References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me> <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-142-218-131.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.1 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Validation-by: gour@atmarama.net Subject: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:49:25 +0200 David MENTRE wrote: > Should I do the same thing, I would write the GUI as an external > process (probably in C++ Qt) and use a communication protocol to > control it from my OCaml program. Or maybe use the binding with Tk, if > the graphical aspect has improved. I got similar advices in Ada community and considered that writing back-end in Ada and GUI front-end in PyQt as last resort. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- For him who has conquered the mind, the mind is the best of friends; but for one who has failed to do so, his mind will remain the greatest enemy. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810