From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rixed@happyleptic.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964047EE25
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:55:21 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=pra; client-ip=88.191.122.7;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=88.191.122.7;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@dagobah.securactive.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=88.191.122.7;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@dagobah.securactive.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAMhei1JYv3oH/2dsb2JhbABZgwfASYEfFnSCJgEFOj8QCyElDwUoIYgYv3IXj1cHgyCBEgOYEZIOgyk
X-IPAS-Result: Ag4FAMhei1JYv3oH/2dsb2JhbABZgwfASYEfFnSCJgEFOj8QCyElDwUoIYgYv3IXj1cHgyCBEgOYEZIOgyk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,729,1378850400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="43779797"
Received: from dagobah.securactive.net ([88.191.122.7])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 13:55:21 +0100
Received: from rd1.labo.securactive.lan (backup.labo.securactive.lan [82.240.34.113])
	by dagobah.securactive.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7766510F;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:55:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ccellier.rd.securactive.lan (unknown [192.168.10.9])
	by rd1.labo.securactive.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A8C2C60072;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:46:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1Vikpr-0005Oe-UY; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:55:19 +0100
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:55:19 +0100
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Cc: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20131119125519.GA18044@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan>
References: <20131118204426.GA14731@annexia.org>
 <1384819720.4083.57.camel@zotac>
 <CAC3Lx=ZrsHau9NicrwTjz-Lt7R5ysdrh4S3KVMOc1vZAAhJpvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPFanBGiuiYCe1Y8KKy+CB-P7xg6rkke0qU9CLpiB0xo89ziNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1384859953.62343.YahooMailNeo@web120403.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1384859953.62343.YahooMailNeo@web120403.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Hardening [Perl's] hash function further

-[ Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:19:13AM -0800, Dario Teixeira ]----
> To complicate matters further, on some architectures but not on others
> you may now or in the future have silicon that speeds up the calculation
> of cryptographic hash functions...

To complicate matters even further, many users concerned about security
will refuse to rely on a hardware blackbox implementation anyway. ;-)