Le Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Adrien Nader a écrit :

> Reducing reviewer work and/or having more reviewers was the actual goal
> behind my proposal.
> Another core aspect is that setting up a mailing-list and putting up a
> "howto contribute" page takes a few minutes of work unlike migrations of
> whole systems or the use of forges(*).
> 
> I was also not thinking of replacing patches and reviews on mantis, more
> having an additional tool to conduct code review although, of course, I
> would prefer a single place for that. In any case, having something
> agreed upon and documented is probably what matters most.
> 
> On a personal note, I also prefer getting fed with emails for which I
> will use a decent client with an editor I enjoy rather than a web
> browser (especially when there's flash on the pages).

So, what's actually needed and sufficient, you believe, is a proper
mailing list manager, which provides a friendly interface to navigate
through the archive?

-- 
Simon