From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D0E7EC6E for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:39:18 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: Neutral (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of simon.cruanes.2007@m4x.org does not assert whether or not 129.104.30.34 is permitted sender) identity=pra; client-ip=129.104.30.34; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-sender="simon.cruanes.2007@m4x.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="spf2.0" Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org designates 129.104.30.34 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=129.104.30.34; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-sender="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="spf2.0" Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@mx1.polytechnique.org designates 129.104.30.34 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=129.104.30.34; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="SRS0=gh7b=WT=m4x.org=simon.cruanes.2007@bounces.m4x.org"; x-sender="postmaster@mx1.polytechnique.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0DAINq1FKBaB4inGdsb2JhbABahxexI4ZrFg4BAQEBAQgUCTyCJQEBAQMBI0sLBQsLISECAg8FKCGIDwgEqiebAhcWkWc1gRMEmBaVRA X-IPAS-Result: Ah0DAINq1FKBaB4inGdsb2JhbABahxexI4ZrFg4BAQEBAQgUCTyCJQEBAQMBI0sLBQsLISECAg8FKCGIDwgEqiebAhcWkWc1gRMEmBaVRA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,655,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="53072271" Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org ([129.104.30.34]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 13 Jan 2014 23:39:18 +0100 Received: from lenat (mna75-4-82-225-76-110.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.76.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98842140C50E2; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:39:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:39:16 +0100 From: Simon Cruanes To: Adrien Nader Cc: caml users Message-ID: <20140113223916.GE976@lenat> References: <20140111152357.GB28133@notk.org> <20140111154146.GA976@lenat> <20140113090444.GA8904@notk.org> <52D3B71B.40802@cea.fr> <20140113223021.GA30935@notk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140113223021.GA30935@notk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at svoboda.polytechnique.org (Mon Jan 13 23:39:17 2014 +0100 (CET)) X-Spam-Flag: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.145787, queueID=D1A01140C50E5 X-Org-Mail: simon.cruanes.2007@polytechnique.org Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Doing compiler patch review with a dedicated mailing-list --YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Adrien Nader a =C3=A9crit : > Reducing reviewer work and/or having more reviewers was the actual goal > behind my proposal. > Another core aspect is that setting up a mailing-list and putting up a > "howto contribute" page takes a few minutes of work unlike migrations of > whole systems or the use of forges(*). >=20 > I was also not thinking of replacing patches and reviews on mantis, more > having an additional tool to conduct code review although, of course, I > would prefer a single place for that. In any case, having something > agreed upon and documented is probably what matters most. >=20 > On a personal note, I also prefer getting fed with emails for which I > will use a decent client with an editor I enjoy rather than a web > browser (especially when there's flash on the pages). So, what's actually needed and sufficient, you believe, is a proper mailing list manager, which provides a friendly interface to navigate through the archive? --=20 Simon --YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJS1GsUAAoJEErAHQhJqmK28UEP/39ryDTfL9tlmgsbQ79R7gLz 7TouWhIhALbmRXuGfAkVcjL08JCz8M/5F4Wxww4fdKHqycfNM4eJkgcC7mhc74hY RtKW41eSM3BXBf/R58gpG3k3I3PTQOoTLXYyOENfO4D2thz3y+4GjnB0lYNeVTyx Bst4yCC1P0DnIrdzJt0CwLXQKkyXle28TCl4agD/67zq4bf/iVMefZNFj36axZnw JhXrCBlwjW7x28ATd74joDsPTmyg4mMkG+PIlM7ntRKNgF6SyWYnb90CPeqrhNEP NEHh9T+snVTgZT4BLV6Ms3S4Q2TdQZYhyCGG+9SaCQACbSurPgZAsvKZfuKbIj18 o53XAxKc01NR+VVm7PmHB+UhPCBU8re71LuU01+xCVwzz+wATJk61fh4WQheYz7+ Lt3h6NkSNPz5B01uVJo2udNqewo0XoOfVGVJnxa5159AYjVqHZBVmXrU8XcBX8pz tFLqZHPqfwLn8ps1A7RownBSN05Mp0ldjCotMj3Y1f9ctv4SmDSAAuCuZxlcwC59 RKvvFg4aPME22zBjNJFMxfOL8YCj7nFAZvJGkqjnpNJqQpUbscxCxWKWlp1Vp7uh p1TGFnpLtLflZwhwgKATuPf4JkOKqYf/LEGJ+EfWxnfFHOW1z8YAwywhkXnApjJ9 N6wasSh1KvEXabGn5nRs =gimg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YkJPYEFdoxh/AXLE--