From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC047F75D for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 06:00:13 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of itz@buug.org) identity=pra; client-ip=198.144.194.12; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="itz@buug.org"; x-sender="itz@buug.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of itz@buug.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.144.194.12; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="itz@buug.org"; x-sender="itz@buug.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@acedia.primate.net) identity=helo; client-ip=198.144.194.12; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="itz@buug.org"; x-sender="postmaster@acedia.primate.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak8BAJV+7FLGkMIMnGdsb2JhbABZg0S+MIEgDgEBAQEBBhYJPIIlAQEEATo0EAsLRlcZh30ICKxpoFAXjwkWhCIEhRKEN45gAYQXiEoBiQ0bNQE X-IPAS-Result: Ak8BAJV+7FLGkMIMnGdsb2JhbABZg0S+MIEgDgEBAQEBBhYJPIIlAQEEATo0EAsLRlcZh30ICKxpoFAXjwkWhCIEhRKEN45gAYQXiEoBiQ0bNQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,760,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="56390067" Received: from disorder.primate.net (HELO acedia.primate.net) ([198.144.194.12]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Feb 2014 06:00:11 +0100 Received: from matica.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1) with ESMTP id s11506hd021621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:00:07 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=matica.lan) by matica.lan with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9SgY-00014c-0c for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:00:06 -0800 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:00:05 -0800 From: Ian Zimmerman To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20140131210005.4b11cf61.itz@buug.org> In-Reply-To: <231864602.UfaybEv0GT@agaric> References: <231864602.UfaybEv0GT@agaric> Organization: Not much X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] OPAM 1.1.1 released On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:23:51 +0100 Louis Gesbert wrote: > We are proud to announce that OPAM 1.1.1 has just been released. If I upgrade, can I keep my existing ~/.opam or do I have to rebuild everything? PS/Meta: This listserv seems to set the Reply-To header on each message to the address of the submitter. This is a form of "header munging" which I have not seen before; the usual (and obnoxious) practice is to set Reply-To to the list address, thus erecting an obstacle against private replies (the obstacle can of course be circumvented by manually editing the headers of a reply, at least if one doesn't use Gmail). On the other hand, this listserv's way makes it harder for a poster to indicate that a private reply is desired. What is the reasoning behind it? -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. gpg public key: 2048R/984A8AE4 fingerprint: 7953 ADA1 0E8E AB57 FB79 FFD2 360A 88B2 984A 8AE4 Funny pic: http://bit.ly/ZNE2MX