From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rixed@happyleptic.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875DB7F7C2
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue,  4 Feb 2014 17:53:18 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=pra; client-ip=5.135.156.187;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=5.135.156.187;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@pim.happyleptic.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=5.135.156.187;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@pim.happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AikNAHMa8VIFh5y7/2dsb2JhbABZgwxIA4JzE7tYB4EFFnSCJgEFOk8LIRMSDwUoiD0BzhoXjnwWGIJ2gRQEmCqSIoMuOw
X-IPAS-Result: AikNAHMa8VIFh5y7/2dsb2JhbABZgwxIA4JzE7tYB4EFFnSCJgEFOk8LIRMSDwUoiD0BzhoXjnwWGIJ2gRQEmCqSIoMuOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,780,1384297200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="47784779"
Received: from pim.happyleptic.org ([5.135.156.187])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 04 Feb 2014 17:53:17 +0100
Received: from rixed by pim.happyleptic.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1WAjFL-0008Bt-1x
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:53:15 +0100
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:53:15 +0100
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20140204165314.GA31451@pim.happyleptic.org>
References: <52F0455E.5040806@riken.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52F0455E.5040806@riken.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is there a runtime cost for this

As long as Something and Something_else are not functors, you
can even compile f separately from these two modules and still
your code calling Something.g should actually call f instead.

If there are some functors, that's another story, unfortunately.