From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306177F860 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:17:35 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo; client-ip=91.121.71.147; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAICwCFNbeUeT/2dsb2JhbABagwaEFb1GgQoWdIImAQUjVhALDgwCBRMOAgIPBRgxiByoPaEWF4EpjTsHgm81gRQEmDMBkieDLjs X-IPAS-Result: AgEFAICwCFNbeUeT/2dsb2JhbABagwaEFb1GgQoWdIImAQUjVhALDgwCBRMOAgIPBRgxiByoPaEWF4EpjTsHgm81gRQEmDMBkieDLjs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,523,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="50054178" Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Feb 2014 15:17:34 +0100 Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 54591C009; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:17:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:17:33 +0100 From: Adrien Nader To: Mark Shinwell Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Vaugon , "caml-list@inria.fr" Message-ID: <20140222141733.GA19246@notk.org> References: <20140218185032.GA20593@notk.org> <5306330F.1020401@inria.fr> <20140221075326.GC7924@notk.org> <53073EFA.2020501@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [RFC] Remaining changes for cross-compilation support in OCaml You probably don't even need a cross binutils. Binutils is often built for several formats. It then boils down to packaging politics. In any case, building a binutils with support for additional architectures is not an issue. I'm a bit worried about the additional complexity to handle this case and possibly the slowdown. -- Adrien Nader