From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <adrien@notk.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8CC7EFCD
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:43:03 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  adrien@notk.org) identity=pra; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  adrien@notk.org designates 91.121.71.147 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org"; x-sender="adrien@notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@nautica.notk.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=91.121.71.147;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="adrien@notk.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@nautica.notk.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAFBkT1RbeUeT/2dsb2JhbABcgw6EMtJxCgKBGxYBfYQDAQEEIw8BRhALGAICBRMOAgIPBRgxiFi2B5UnAQEBBwEBAQEBHYEsj1wHgnc2gR4FnWABli6DeTyCegEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: AggFAFBkT1RbeUeT/2dsb2JhbABcgw6EMtJxCgKBGxYBfYQDAQEEIw8BRhALGAICBRMOAgIPBRgxiFi2B5UnAQEBBwEBAQEBHYEsj1wHgnc2gR4FnWABli6DeTyCegEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,801,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="103319359"
Received: from nautica.notk.org ([91.121.71.147])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 28 Oct 2014 10:43:02 +0100
Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id BA6DCC009; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:43:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:43:01 +0100
From: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
To: Francois Berenger <francois.berenger@inria.fr>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <20141028094301.GA4036@notk.org>
References: <544F618D.10504@inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <544F618D.10504@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Is it possible to define a Printf.sprintf-like that
 is lazy?

Hi

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014, Francois Berenger wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I mean, the parameters are not formated unless the function is forced.


Have you looked at Printf.kfprintf and ikprintf (which is >= 4.00
iirc) ?

-- 
Adrien Nader