caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Problem with universal functions in a module
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:50:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150107135012.GA17784@frosties> (raw)

Hi,

I have a functor that boxes a GADT type into an universal container.
But then the problem is how to get the type back out again.
Specifically I want to pass the data to a polymorphic function that
doesn't care what type it gets since it will pattern match the GADT to
determine the right type.

But, because the argument is a GADT, ocaml complains after unboxing
the type would escape its scope (see call_unboxed below). One can only
call an universal function with the unboxed data and only records (and
objects) can have universal functions.

Problem is that I would like to keep the implementation of the helper
record abstract and only provide a constructor (helper function
below). But the constructor needs an universal function and function
argument are only polymorphic (less general).

A) why is a polymorphic function less general here?

The print function is good enough for List.iter below or for
constructing a helper but not indirectly via "M.helper fn".

Why are function arguments less general than their original function?

B) is there some way around this I'm not seeing?

MfG
	Goswin

--


             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 13:50 Goswin von Brederlow [this message]
2015-01-07 15:30 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2015-01-07 17:26 ` Jeremy Yallop
2015-01-08  9:45   ` Ben Millwood
2015-01-08 15:21     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2015-01-08 16:25       ` Leo White
2015-01-09  1:02         ` Jacques Garrigue
2015-01-10 18:02           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2015-01-10 17:52         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2015-01-10 18:49           ` Leo White
2015-01-12 14:28             ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150107135012.GA17784@frosties \
    --to=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).