From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F132F7FCCB for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:52:36 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of s@xss.de) identity=pra; client-ip=78.46.20.70; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stefan@xss.de"; x-sender="s@xss.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of stefan@xss.de designates 78.46.20.70 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=78.46.20.70; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stefan@xss.de"; x-sender="stefan@xss.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@s8.swsch.de) identity=helo; client-ip=78.46.20.70; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stefan@xss.de"; x-sender="postmaster@s8.swsch.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C6AQDrpRVVl0YULk5cg1hagxOwJJIHCoV1gTtMAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBCBYHQoQUAQEBAwEjDwENAQE3AQ8LGAICBRMOAgIPBSghE4gbAwkMAQixQnCEYgEFj2cMhUIBCwEZAgSBIYoHhDYPgmc7Eh2BFoYfjiyGAAGBG4VnA4Y1hneCJByBUW4BgQOBPwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0C6AQDrpRVVl0YULk5cg1hagxOwJJIHCoV1gTtMAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBCBYHQoQUAQEBAwEjDwENAQE3AQ8LGAICBRMOAgIPBSghE4gbAwkMAQixQnCEYgEFj2cMhUIBCwEZAgSBIYoHhDYPgmc7Eh2BFoYfjiyGAAGBG4VnA4Y1hneCJByBUW4BgQOBPwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,480,1422918000"; d="scan'208";a="130468519" Received: from s8.swsch.de ([78.46.20.70]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Mar 2015 19:52:36 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=swsch.de; s=s8; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=lQJ0sLgvpeTxtvLIn0cCf+WlGAgeXNXMGsdpSfQ8ouM=; b=VDdq1OXmlE6CgyqHA7KLV+nh1qB3cQGNpd4RfMdsWDwVlf4NT6iS865wefpuj5loFLs7G2U7jM6rHUwdNuwuTaRKqXn06hfCmxDuxA70vtZVx9WGra32GS7PC31J3xpL; Received: from server.edv-schmiedl.de ([213.239.214.226]) by s8.swsch.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YbZMx-0003mp-MS; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:52:35 +0100 Received: from [93.223.61.243] (helo=g128.local) by server.edv-schmiedl.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YbZMx-0004HH-86; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:52:35 +0100 Received: from stefan by g128.local with local (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YbZMw-0006xU-N2; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:52:34 +0100 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:52:34 +0100 From: Stefan Schmiedl To: "Mr. Herr" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20150327185234.GD5674@g128.fritz.box> References: <2162350.aHZvdojE6Q@agaric> <55159AD3.7050507@freenet.de> <5515A183.3020709@freenet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5515A183.3020709@freenet.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Scan-Signature: 6ece5a77cee57f530c981537a62fa7e1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM 1.2.1 Mr. Herr (27.03. 19:29): > > > On 27.03.2015 19:09, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:00, Mr. Herr wrote: > >> > >> the 1.2.1 binary from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/1.2.1, as well as the compile result of > >> opam-full-1.2.1.tar.gz are behaving strange on my opensuse 1.3.1. > >> > >> All I did was to replace the 1.2.0 binaries with the 1.2.1 version. > >> > >> Here a console log where 'opam' is /usr/local/bin/opam-1.2.1-x86_64-Linux > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol/strobel-sources> opam update > >> > >> =-=- Updating package repositories =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > >> [default] synchronized from https://opam.ocaml.org > >> > >> Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade': > >> ===== ↻ 1 ↗ 1 ===== > >> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> opam-1.2.0-x86_64-Linux update > >> [default] Downloading https://opam.ocaml.org/urls.txt > >> Updating /opt/opam/repo/compiler-index ... > >> Updating /opt/opam/compilers/ ... > >> Updating /opt/opam/repo/package-index ... > >> Updating /opt/opam/packages/ ... > >> > >> Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade': > >> === 1 to reinstall | 1 to upgrade === > >> strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> What can I do to debug this? > >> > > I'm not sure if I've missed something obvious, since you haven't specified what you think has gone wrong. You appear to have typed in "opam update" twice. > > > > Either do "opam update -u" (which updates the package sets and upgrades them), or "opam update && opam upgrade". > > > > > the output from the 1.2.0 version is there for reference, this is what I have come to > expect. > > The 1.2.1 binary is not doing the same checks, and outputs hieroglyphs - very dubious. With an unicode-compatible font, the first glyph looks like a circle with an arrow, i.e. 1 reinstall, and the second is an arrow pointing to upper-right, i.e. 1 upgrade. s.