From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rich@annexia.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 080DB7EEFA
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:59:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rich@annexia.org) identity=pra; client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  rich@annexia.org designates 80.68.91.176 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AdKQDos4tV/7BbRFBbgxFUX4E8qSMFAQEBAQEBBQGBBJMMhXQCAgKBO0wBAQEBAQGBC0EBAgKDXQEBAwEMJgFGEAshExIPBSghiDoMAQjNUAEBAQEGAQEBAQEZBIYcPYRxhQYHgxeBFAWRKIJdAYRXhniBO4QQkm4mgg0bgVM9MQGCRwEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A0AdKQDos4tV/7BbRFBbgxFUX4E8qSMFAQEBAQEBBQGBBJMMhXQCAgKBO0wBAQEBAQGBC0EBAgKDXQEBAwEMJgFGEAshExIPBSghiDoMAQjNUAEBAQEGAQEBAQEZBIYcPYRxhQYHgxeBFAWRKIJdAYRXhniBO4QQkm4mgg0bgVM9MQGCRwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,675,1427752800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="137750507"
Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 25 Jun 2015 09:59:00 +0200
Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <rich@annexia.org>)
	id 1Z823m-0004t1-H0; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:58:58 +0100
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:58:58 +0100
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rich@annexia.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?B?VPZy9ms=?= Edwin <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20150625075858.GC31462@annexia.org>
References: <20150623195254.GA32190@annexia.org>
 <5589C490.2030804@etorok.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5589C490.2030804@etorok.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] inconsistent assumptions over implementation Printf

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:41:52PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]

Thanks - I have filed a bug about generating better dependencies:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235561

> > Also - could we *please* make the error message more explanatory.
> > Printing out the mismatching MD5 hashes would be a good start.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, and a -r flag on ocamlobjinfo.

What would the -r flag do?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat