caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:44:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150831164436.GA24584@topoi.pooq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55E47D5A.6080806@inria.fr>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:14:18PM +0200, Francois Berenger wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 06:06 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> >Le 27/08/2015 10:17, Gabriel Scherer a écrit :
> >>Depending on external libraries used to be a problem when there was no
> >>consensus on OCaml packaging (no longer than a few years ago people
> >>where reluctant to even use ocamlfind). We now have a reasonable
> >>consensus on a packaging story, and installing third-party libraries
> >>has never been as easy as it is today -- except on Windows, meh.
> >>I think you should embrace the idea of depending on software outside
> >>the OCaml distribution.
> >
> >Depending on a multitude of external libraries makes packaging more
> >difficult. I am talking about "system" packaging (deb, rpm...) here, not
> >OPAM. And "install OPAM first" is not a very satisfactory way of
> >installing some software written in OCaml in a stable environment.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> In my experience, opam installs are quite reproducible.
> You can even specify the version number you want to install.
> 
> The only problem I see is that opam install things in a user's home
> directory, which is not what you want for a system-wise installation
> of a software/library.

So there should be a superuser option, telling opam to install in the
system-wide installation area.  Of course that wouldn't work if you 
don't have the relevant permissions, not should it.  And the details of 
the superuser option (such as where to install what) may be 
system-dependent.

There are Debian packages that access the net during installation; most 
notably some device drivers on Debian, where the manufacturer releases 
its own installation procedure, but does not allow redistribution.  So 
the Debian package, during installation, downloads the manufacturer's 
installer and executes it.

No reason why the, say ocaml packages shouldn't do likewise using 
opam.  One bit of hackery could wrap all the available opam packages.

--- hendrik


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-31 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-27  2:52 Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-27  6:59 ` Christoph Höger
2015-08-27  7:18 ` Anthony Tavener
2015-08-27  8:17   ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-27 10:35     ` Romain Bardou
2015-08-27 19:55       ` Martin DeMello
2015-08-27 20:10         ` Yotam Barnoy
2015-08-27 23:24           ` Drup
2015-08-28 13:23           ` Philippe Veber
2015-08-27 20:17         ` Raoul Duke
2015-08-27 23:10       ` Martin Jambon
     [not found]     ` <20150827174554.14858.6618@localhost>
2015-08-27 18:42       ` [Caml-list] Fwd: " Emmanuel Surleau
2015-08-27 21:17     ` [Caml-list] " Paolo Donadeo
2015-08-27 21:51       ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-27 21:56         ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-27 22:04           ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-28  0:50     ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-31 16:06     ` Stéphane Glondu
2015-08-31 16:14       ` Francois Berenger
2015-08-31 16:44         ` Hendrik Boom [this message]
2015-08-31 18:04           ` Ian Zimmerman
2015-08-31 17:26         ` Stéphane Glondu
2015-09-01 15:06           ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-08-31 17:34       ` Oliver Bandel
2015-09-01 13:46       ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-27  8:07 ` Sébastien Hinderer
2015-08-27  8:20   ` Daniil Baturin
2015-08-27  9:34     ` Edouard Evangelisti
2015-08-28  9:07       ` r.3
2015-08-27  8:12 ` Francois Berenger
2015-08-27 11:57   ` Drup
2015-08-27 14:17 ` Yaron Minsky
2015-08-27 16:00   ` Jesse Haber-Kucharsky
2015-08-28  0:33     ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-08-28  1:53       ` Daniel Bünzli
     [not found]       ` <20150828.140826.2157566405742612169.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
2015-08-28 12:38         ` Thomas Braibant
2015-08-28 13:00           ` [Caml-list] opam license field (was Re: We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really) Daniel Bünzli
2015-08-28 13:06             ` David Sheets
2015-08-28 14:01         ` [Caml-list] We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really Oliver Bandel
2015-08-31 15:26           ` Hendrik Boom
2015-08-28 14:35         ` Alain Frisch
2015-08-29 19:02           ` David MENTRÉ
2015-08-31 12:37             ` Jon Harrop
2015-08-31 15:05               ` Emmanuel Surleau
2015-08-31 17:31                 ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-28 15:02         ` Simon Cruanes
2015-08-28 15:27           ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-08-28 15:51         ` Oliver Bandel
2015-08-31 18:40       ` Ashish Agarwal
2016-03-27 20:54     ` Jon Harrop
2016-03-27 21:21       ` Simon Cruanes
2016-03-27 23:48       ` Yaron Minsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150831164436.GA24584@topoi.pooq.com \
    --to=hendrik@topoi.pooq.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).