From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676537F736 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:10:57 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:3LtFHhD2JJDM64GZERbJUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP7/psbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakU16yL7+u5BTZIyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/ni6bvp9aKP18ArQH+SI0xBS3+lR/WuMgSjNkqAYcK4TyNnEF1ff9Lz3hjP1OZkkW0zM6x+Jl+73YY4Kp5pIYTGZn9Kq8xSLgdCDU9L0g04tfqvF/NV1ih/HwZB0UblBZSAguNxhb9W9+lsib8uvB82wGGOtXxTPYsXjO7qaxsTUm72288Kzcl/TSP2YRLh6VBrUf5qg== Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=hendrik@topoi.pooq.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=hendrik@topoi.pooq.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@april.topoi.pooq.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of hendrik@topoi.pooq.com) identity=pra; client-ip=69.165.131.134; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hendrik@topoi.pooq.com"; x-sender="hendrik@topoi.pooq.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of hendrik@topoi.pooq.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=69.165.131.134; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hendrik@topoi.pooq.com"; x-sender="hendrik@topoi.pooq.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@april.topoi.pooq.com) identity=helo; client-ip=69.165.131.134; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hendrik@topoi.pooq.com"; x-sender="postmaster@april.topoi.pooq.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZCAAQrwhW/4aDpUVchD2DALpsh3QCgWkSAQEBAQEBAQGBCYIdgggBAQQ6KyQLGAklDwUYiHLKXAEBCAIgi3CFFBeDAYEUBZVwjQoFUZpuKAswhB0iiVQBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0AZCAAQrwhW/4aDpUVchD2DALpsh3QCgWkSAQEBAQEBAQGBCYIdgggBAQQ6KyQLGAklDwUYiHLKXAEBCAIgi3CFFBeDAYEUBZVwjQoFUZpuKAswhB0iiVQBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,600,1437429600"; d="scan'208";a="148750603" Received: from topoi.pooq.com (HELO april.topoi.pooq.com) ([69.165.131.134]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2015 05:10:55 +0200 Received: by april.topoi.pooq.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 74A551A0769; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 23:08:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 23:08:31 -0400 From: Hendrik Boom To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20150928030831.GC30548@topoi.pooq.com> References: <20150925181948.GA29830@topoi.pooq.com> <20150925203027.GA32234@seneca.home.org> <20150925224657.GA3281@topoi.pooq.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150925224657.GA3281@topoi.pooq.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Is tuareg crashing for anyone else? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 06:46:57PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:30:27PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:19:48PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > I've been using tuareg mode in emacs, and I find it crashing enough to be unusable. > > > It seems to happen when I'm editing a typed function argument, such as > > > the arguents in: > > > > [...] > > > > > I'm running devuan jessie, with packages opam 1.2.0-1, tuareg1:2.0.7-1, > > > and emacs24 23+4.1-5. > > > > do you also observe the crashes with 1:2.0.9-2 from debian ? Upstream > > 1:2.0.9 fixed a bad interaction with show-paren-mode (debian bug #780805) > But the parentheses around typed parameters could certainly be part of > the problem. At least once weren't balanced when it crashed while I was > editing! > > But 1.2.0.9 hasn't made it to jessie yet. > > I've installed 2.0.8 from opam to replace 1:2.0.7-1 from jessie. > Haven't used it long enough to tell. But if it takes 2.0.9, it won't be > enough. Unless opam and jessie are out of sync. There doesn't > seem to be a 2.0.9 in opam yet. 2.0.8 was the version > that opam installed with > opam install tuareg. > > I'll report back when I've had experience with opam's 2.0.8 version. The problem seems to have disappeared with 2.0.8. Or I've been luckky in not triggering it. -- hendrik