From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350107EF5E for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:37:13 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Eoh8sBN2CIZzPDdvXUsl6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIMzox0KPr+rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsKMczbaK+PuwEUU7or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6anHS+4HYoFwnlMkItf6KuS9aU05j8jLD60qaQSj0AvCC6b7J2IUf+hiTqne5Sv7FfLL0swADCuHpCdrce72ppIVWOg0S0vZ/or9ZLuh5dsPM59sNGTb6yP+FhFeQZX3waNDUZ7dfqslH/QAqf63oGWy1CnhNSAg+D8Bz7TprwqCLSsO5wyTWXO4v9SrViChq46KI+cyeg3DwfHzkj+mDLg8h+i7IdqxWk8U8si7XIaZ2YYaItNpjWeskXEC8YBp5c Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=sp@orbitalfox.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=sp@orbitalfox.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@portal.orbitalfox.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of sp@orbitalfox.com) identity=pra; client-ip=95.172.232.202; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-sender="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of sp@orbitalfox.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=95.172.232.202; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-sender="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@portal.orbitalfox.com) identity=helo; client-ip=95.172.232.202; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sp@orbitalfox.com"; x-sender="postmaster@portal.orbitalfox.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BVBwCNyYhX/8rorF9dhCexQ4oThhoCDIFjEAEBAQEBAQEBZCdBDgGBYgQBEgGCEwEFOAI/EAsYCSUPBSghiEcBv2cBAQEBBgEBAQEjHopZhSOCSYIvAQSZDhOOUYFfjWCQGzUfg3Q7gyKDYwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0BVBwCNyYhX/8rorF9dhCexQ4oThhoCDIFjEAEBAQEBAQEBZCdBDgGBYgQBEgGCEwEFOAI/EAsYCSUPBSghiEcBv2cBAQEBBgEBAQEjHopZhSOCSYIvAQSZDhOOUYFfjWCQGzUfg3Q7gyKDYwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,368,1464645600"; d="scan'208";a="184911660" Received: from w-202.cust-20351.ip.static.uno.uk.net (HELO portal.orbitalfox.com) ([95.172.232.202]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2016 13:37:12 +0200 Received: from tiger (tiger [192.168.88.5]) by portal.orbitalfox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8856BAA0074; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:37:08 +0100 From: SP To: Dario Teixeira Cc: caml-list Message-ID: <20160715113708.GF5091@tiger> References: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ZeroMQ vs Nanomsg On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:59:12AM +0100, Dario Teixeira wrote: >I would be much obliged to hear your opinions and experiences with >either project. I will be using the OCaml bindings, obviously, so the >maturity of the bindings is also a factor. (On first glance they seem >quite complete and both offer support for LWT, which is a must.) What I'm curious about is how interoperable they are. Can one switch between the two back-ends or bindings? Does either of them "wrap" the other? -- SP