On Tue, Jul 18, Adrien Nader wrote:

> First of all, I absolutely definitely completely would not call these
> "needless" and even less say that breakage was voluntary. I understand
> your frustration but the way you communicate about the issue doesn't
> come out as nice.

It was not meant to be rude or demanding. Sorry for that.

> I don't think it makes sense to try to give you straight away another
> variable to use. Chances are that, in the first place, this variable
> wasn't the one that made sense to use. Moreover its content could change
> at any time (and did change). If you explain the needs, then it should
> be possible to give you better hints to adapt to this change.

It seems labltk is the only package which makes use of BYTECC/NATIVECC.
So in this context cc7ad5650a is correct.

I was hoping labltk.git#master would just work with "every" ocaml
version. But now #master works with none.

As noted in other replies, there is an issue open at github. Hopefully
it gets sorted out at some point.


Olaf