From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE6FBBAF for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:09:20 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,439,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="33374551" Received: from 250-120.msr-inria.inria.fr (HELO [10.0.1.2]) ([193.55.250.120]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 23 Sep 2009 17:09:20 +0200 Message-Id: <21344828-8F8C-457A-98C4-3058D7D6DBAD@inria.fr> From: Damien Doligez To: caml users In-Reply-To: <4AB9D439.4070304@inescporto.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Cache algorithms: implementation or library available? Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:09:20 +0200 References: <4AB8A6F1.7090802@inescporto.pt> <4AB8B44F.6040503@ens-lyon.org> <4AB9D439.4070304@inescporto.pt> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 2009:98 23,:98 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 algorithms:03 module:03 module:03 library:03 inria:06 weak:06 weak:06 On 2009-09-23, at 09:54, Hugo Ferreira wrote: > Funny enough I was expecting complicated uses of the Weak module. The Weak module is never the right tool for implementing a cache. -- Damien