From: murthy@margaux
To: caml-list@margaux
Subject: Humpf ... chaines des caracteres sont bien efficace!
Date: Thu, 20 May 93 18:10:51 N [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21515.737914251@margaux.inria.fr> (raw)
je viens de faire des essais ou j'ai remplace' des chaines de
caracteres par les indices sur un table de hachage, qui n'est
qu'utilise' pour parsing et impression.
Et sur un input assez compute-bound, la difference ne se voit presque
pas.
Est-il le cas qu'on fait qqchose de tres intelligent pour les tables
de hachage en caml-light, surtout pour les caracteres?
--chet--
next reply other threads:[~1993-05-24 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-05-24 7:43 murthy [this message]
1993-05-26 22:11 ` Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21515.737914251@margaux.inria.fr \
--to=murthy@margaux \
--cc=caml-list@margaux \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).