From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <murthy.chet@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C985B7F30A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:11:55 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  murthy.chet@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.223.179;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="murthy.chet@gmail.com";
  x-sender="murthy.chet@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  murthy.chet@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.179;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="murthy.chet@gmail.com";
  x-sender="murthy.chet@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ie0-f179.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.223.179;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="murthy.chet@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f179.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmUHAOViPlHRVd+ziWdsb2JhbABDh2KCcroQgV0WDgEBARMUEiqCKQEBBToGARsdAQMMBgUYCRUQDwETEQEFARwGiBMBAw+hKYwygnuEXQoZJw1ZiHwBBQyPAgeDQAOIcpdMhSo/hE0
X-IPAS-Result: AmUHAOViPlHRVd+ziWdsb2JhbABDh2KCcroQgV0WDgEBARMUEiqCKQEBBToGARsdAQMMBgUYCRUQDwETEQEFARwGiBMBAw+hKYwygnuEXQoZJw1ZiHwBBQyPAgeDQAOIcpdMhSo/hE0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,825,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="5004439"
Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Mar 2013 00:11:54 +0100
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so5509590iea.24
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-type;
        bh=0IaGBeIH64rdfiMIsnG07efVonDvBTUohCCSoIJqEz8=;
        b=pCb/o+sHAbfkkmthBj8GBTNf8ImDniiwKuTLNhlHXacHzJsFbgzvs60AFyU/0Mg9gK
         kD2t/uLwTCiyn6E3dOoTfQXY+k7b6Btcjc1O51EllBlm7R3zezYQaqqdi0TwvYCfjnyd
         jdXaAXBGLwCr86VjNoqr9aaNyp0fbJShLEYiGjtUQa9wGq1kQITSxjzVlLWaxJvotqbv
         2HlSjP6c6SBEXdmJxnZ2rB6PTFl4a/zSKjSNiaOO1nYwvOEFCK1hEWiGlsZ7ZGLF8eqO
         BHEj8N1qhyOdWjkHgoq9Oy0ISMzKOrUvU+VB+MGi7UNlp7w4gKcQZcygbq6wnYK+yHdV
         VCFw==
X-Received: by 10.42.58.67 with SMTP id g3mr10441452ich.56.1363043513712;
        Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from groupon.localnet (ip-64-134-233-80.public.wayport.net. [64.134.233.80])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id px9sm18765466igc.0.2013.03.11.16.11.48
        (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chet Murthy <murthy.chet@gmail.com>
To: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:11:32 -0700
Message-ID: <2278470.xAKQ5esFd6@groupon>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-38-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.5; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20130311230945.GA3230@siouxsie>
References: <4283364.UnedZ1M6uD@groupon> <20130311230945.GA3230@siouxsie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml systhreads condition variables: no
 condvar_timedwait?


Oops, sorry, yes, I meant pthread_cond_timedwait().  In any case, it's
not wrappered in Ocaml systhreads, though clearly from the
implementation of pthread_cond_wait() (well, "st_condvar_wait" in
st_posix.h), it's trivial to add.

Just wondering why it was omitted, is all.

--chet--

On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:09:45 AM oliver wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:17:13PM -0700, Chet Murthy wrote:
> > I'm just starting to use Ocaml threads, and notice that there's no
> > equivalent of pthread_condvar_timedwait.
> 
> [...]
> 
> I looked up this function and found nothing.
> It seems this is your personal phantasy function,
> or possibly just a typo.
> 
> Possibly you mean
>   pthread_cond_timedwait()
> 
> Ciao,
>    Oliver