caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erick Matsen <matsen@berkeley.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: speeding up matrix multiplication (newbie question)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:40:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <243054520902200740j1d1874adib27645f6e090b073@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello Ocaml community---


I'm working on speeding up some code, and I wanted to check with
someone before implementation.

As you can see below, the code primarily spends its time multiplying relatively
small matrices. Precision is of course important but not an incredibly crucial
issue, as the most important thing is relative comparison between things which
*should* be pretty different. Currently I'm just using native
(double-precision) ocaml floats and the native ocaml arrays for a first pass on
the problem.

Now I'm thinking about moving to using float32 bigarrays, and I'm hoping that
the code will double in speed. I'd like to know: is that realistic? Any other
suggestions?


Thank you,

Erick



--------   profiling information --------

%      cumulative  self     self       total
time   seconds     seconds  calls      s/call  s/call  name
30.27  7.44        7.44     836419     0.00    0.00    camlMat__mul_vec_263
15.42  11.23       3.79     335237785  0.00    0.00    camlMat__get_447
14.65  14.83       3.60     334624076  0.00    0.00    camlNumber__mul_185
13.75  18.21       3.38     682814594  0.00    0.00    caml_apply2
11.31  20.99       2.78     334624076  0.00    0.00    camlNumber__add_183
6.02   22.47       1.48     335724401  0.00    0.00    caml_apply3
1.14   22.75       0.28     480860     0.00    0.00    camlDiagd__fun_304
1.06   23.01       0.26     159338     0.00    0.00    caml_oldify_local_roots
1.06   23.27       0.26     79634      0.00    0.00    sweep_slice
0.90   23.49       0.22     79828      0.00    0.00    mark_slice
0.65   23.65       0.16     10455018   0.00    0.00    camlQtree__code_begin
0.61   23.80       0.15     1517329    0.00    0.00    caml_oldify_one
0.57   23.94       0.14     17592082   0.00    0.00    camlMat__n_cols_458
0.57   24.08       0.14     13102569   0.00    0.00    caml_modify
0.57   24.22       0.14     522761     0.00    0.00    camlArray__mapi_142
...


             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-20 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-20 15:40 Erick Matsen [this message]
2009-02-20 15:45 ` [Caml-list] " RABIH.ELCHAAR
2009-02-20 17:46 ` Jon Harrop
2009-02-20 18:46 ` Xavier Leroy
2009-02-20 19:53   ` Erick Matsen
2009-02-20 21:21     ` Will M. Farr
2009-02-20 21:37     ` Martin Jambon
2009-02-20 22:23     ` Mike Lin
2009-02-20 22:30       ` Will M. Farr
2009-02-20 22:43         ` Markus Mottl
2009-02-23 22:59           ` Erick Matsen
2009-02-20 22:43         ` Mike Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=243054520902200740j1d1874adib27645f6e090b073@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=matsen@berkeley.edu \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).