From: yoann padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>
To: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>,
Yaron Minsky <yminsky@cs.cornell.edu>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ray tracer language comparison
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:38:15 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26802443.1128868695235.JavaMail.www@wwinf1535> (raw)
>
> > It seems like on the whole a more fitting riposte might have been to
> > provide a version of the SBCL implementation that was 8x faster than
> > Jon's, rather than to provide a crippled version of Jon's that was 8x
> > slower. But to each his own, I suppose....
>
> What? You call that elegant use of higher order functions "crippled"?
> What a Blasphemy. I am really, truly outraged.
But on what side are you ?
Looking at your signature you seems like a big fan of functionnal programming
but you are sending opposite signals in your post.
It is not clear to me what is your point. What do you want to demonstrate ?
>
> ...on the other hand...
>
> [wicked thinking]
> [most evil sniggering]
> [pictures of the great evil genius playing the organ]
> [more of all the above]
> [ *clickediclick* ]
>
> Bring that man to be, he shalt be served as well!
>
> I just extended my analysis by another implementation in yet another
> language. This time, it's "Steel Bank Common Lisp". As this is a Lisp as
> well, I will be concerned primarily with comparing it against SBCL, but it
> may also be nice to compare it with OCaml, or Objective Caml.
>
> There it is:
>
> http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf/raytracer/#sbcl
>
> --
> regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_
> Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\
> (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_
> (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-09 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-09 14:38 yoann padioleau [this message]
2005-10-09 16:00 ` Chris Campbell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-03 23:18 Jon Harrop
2005-10-04 13:49 ` [Caml-list] " Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 5:26 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 11:24 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-10-09 13:59 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 17:37 ` Florian Weimer
2005-10-09 18:07 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-09 14:58 ` Jon Harrop
2005-10-09 17:25 ` Thomas Fischbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26802443.1128868695235.JavaMail.www@wwinf1535 \
--to=padator@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=yminsky@cs.cornell.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).