From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F3B7FC41 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:28:25 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:CW5rGB9KDqqopf9uRHKM819IXTAuvvDOBiVQ1KB91uIcTK2v8tzYMVDF4r011RmSDdmdtq4P0rqM+4nbGkU+or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6anHS+4HYoFwnlMkItf6KuStKU0pj8jrDos7ToICx2xxOFKYtoKxu3qQiD/uI3uqBFbpgL9x3Sv3FTcP5Xz247bXianhL7+9vitMU7q3cY6Lod8JtjXKT5eOweRL9RED1uZ2M45c7ssxrfZQSK73oYFG4Rl0wbLRLC6UTTWJvrvyLh/tB6wzKQMNf5BeQuXi+55apxRzftkCZCLCEitmbNhZoj3+pgvBu9qkknkMbva4aPOa8mcw== Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=rossberg@mpi-sws.org; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=rossberg@mpi-sws.org; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@hera.mpi-klsb.mpg.de Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of rossberg@mpi-sws.org) identity=pra; client-ip=139.19.1.49; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="rossberg@mpi-sws.org"; x-sender="rossberg@mpi-sws.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of rossberg@mpi-sws.org designates 139.19.1.49 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=139.19.1.49; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="rossberg@mpi-sws.org"; x-sender="rossberg@mpi-sws.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@hera.mpi-klsb.mpg.de) identity=helo; client-ip=139.19.1.49; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="rossberg@mpi-sws.org"; x-sender="postmaster@hera.mpi-klsb.mpg.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ByAgD+3AhWhDEBE4tdg3hpvUiBfYVtCgKBbhIBAQEBAQEBARABAQEKBwQJCSEugh2CCAEBBDoGAQE3AQ8LGC4hNgYTiBkDEgQJtTyFVgEFih8NhQwBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBARMCBIkCgm6CUB4JghYHgxiBFJV1hRWGCopxiniHRigBgj6Bf2+JIQEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0ByAgD+3AhWhDEBE4tdg3hpvUiBfYVtCgKBbhIBAQEBAQEBARABAQEKBwQJCSEugh2CCAEBBDoGAQE3AQ8LGC4hNgYTiBkDEgQJtTyFVgEFih8NhQwBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBARMCBIkCgm6CUB4JghYHgxiBFJV1hRWGCopxiniHRigBgj6Bf2+JIQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,601,1437429600"; d="scan'208";a="148760565" Received: from infao0809.mpi-klsb.mpg.de (HELO hera.mpi-klsb.mpg.de) ([139.19.1.49]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 28 Sep 2015 08:28:25 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mpi-sws.org; s=mail200803; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject; bh=VN4RE/gMaUnB9Pa3WHLda4ydBcQodJlmRDCr8nJAvDs=; b=PZMiMw2/pVmr+rC2YTtivt/tAYm/CAuiHG8wzyQFPpRkjnhh5jREOg2UoUcxAmahgA2neRzGHuRB1uec/gUSJObLWC9F/fa//yxEhqsVYhSfH6o9RMc9K1/X4dgj+d7bBOKsrF3r58bkM6ru8WVDcozo1Bo+nW0eCSVcBkw85ik=; Received: from maniac.mpi-klsb.mpg.de ([139.19.1.28]:44572) by hera.mpi-klsb.mpg.de (envelope-from ) with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) id 1ZgRvC-0004B1-Dy; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:28:24 +0200 Received: from 109.125.107.239.dynamic.cablesurf.de ([109.125.107.239]:65185 helo=macbook-air.fritz.box) by maniac.mpi-klsb.mpg.de (envelope-from ) with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) id 1ZgRvB-000229-Rs; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:28:21 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Andreas Rossberg In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:28:20 +0200 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <270D5C05-462B-43B7-918D-6135D41B0BD6@mpi-sws.org> References: To: Keiko Nakata X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-MPI-Local-Sender: true Subject: Re: [Caml-list] unsigned 64-bit integers On Sep 28, 2015, at 08:18 , Keiko Nakata wrote: > > What would be best ways to compute with unsigned 64-bit integers? > I would like to perform 64-bit address space computations. See e.g. how unsigned int64 operators are implemented here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/blob/master/ml-proto/src/spec/i64.ml /Andreas