From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B250DBBAF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:54:27 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAChF7EzCpx5ei2dsb2JhbACUP441FgELCyIivHGFTASNbg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,246,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="80086787" Received: from sucre.univ-orleans.fr ([194.167.30.94]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 07:54:27 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sucre.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E5B94385; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:54:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from sucre.univ-orleans.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sucre.univ-orleans.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7GBefyZoi+8D; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:54:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (smtps.univ-orleans.fr [194.167.30.152]) by sucre.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73B09435A; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:54:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (dau94-10-88-189-211-192.fbx.proxad.net [88.189.211.192]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB4736E60; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:54:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: David Rajchenbach-Teller In-Reply-To: <399914.90589.qm@web120504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:54:25 +0100 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <29C13D60-7132-4657-837E-D28B82067B15@univ-orleans.fr> References: <399914.90589.qm@web120504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: evil sloot X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 univ-orleans:01 haskell:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 beginners:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 bin:01 caml:02 caml:02 implemented:02 archives:02 Submitted this a few years ago (just with streams, not Lwt), and the = solution was rejected. On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:21 AM, evil sloot wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Regarding alternative solutions to the shootout problems: > The thread ring problem can be easily implemented using Lwt > yielding (pun intended ;)) performance=20 > comparable to the haskell solution >=20 > have fun, >=20 > Romain. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs