caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Cc: "François Bobot" <francois.bobot@cea.fr>,
	"caml users" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Doing compiler patch review with a dedicated mailing-list
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:57:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2B910790530D483F8126FFAFF3C6882E@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBFZM5+-u9tDd1eSpVN2jzEYwDijiu109VoOLPteEfkyBQ@mail.gmail.com>



Le lundi, 13 janvier 2014 à 14:26, Gabriel Scherer a écrit :

> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Daniel Bünzli
> <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch (mailto:daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch)> wrote:
> > It's not only easy to browse, it's *great* to browse: all the web-based mailing list archives I interact with are not even able to follow a thread running across two month. I really feel we're in 2014.
>  
> This is a bit too snarky for me to guess what you want.

Regarding what I want, I think #6052 is pretty clear, as is its resolution, which I perfectly understand: it's up to the dev team to choose the tools and workflows that suit them. But what I wanted to say is: if you are going to change your practice, at least, don't replace it by something that seems more broken (at least to me) than what we currently have.

Best,

Daniel




  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-11 15:23 Adrien Nader
2014-01-11 15:41 ` Simon Cruanes
2014-01-13  9:04   ` Adrien Nader
2014-01-13  9:51     ` François Bobot
2014-01-13 10:27       ` Gabriel Scherer
2014-01-13 11:14         ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-01-13 13:26           ` Gabriel Scherer
2014-01-13 13:43             ` Thomas Refis
2014-01-13 13:51               ` Gabriel Scherer
2014-01-13 13:57               ` Simon Cruanes
2014-01-13 15:03                 ` Török Edwin
2014-01-13 13:58               ` Kakadu
2014-02-17 22:55                 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-01-13 13:57             ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2014-01-13 22:30             ` Adrien Nader
2014-01-13 22:39               ` Simon Cruanes
2014-01-13 23:09                 ` Adrien Nader
2014-01-14 11:13             ` Gabriel Kerneis
2014-01-14 13:23               ` François Bobot
2014-01-14 13:27                 ` Thomas Gazagnaire
2014-01-14 14:06                   ` Markus Mottl
2014-01-14 14:12                     ` Simon Cruanes
2014-01-14 14:55                       ` Amir Chaudhry
2014-01-14 15:09                       ` François Bobot
2014-01-14 15:11                         ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2014-01-13 16:42         ` Yotam Barnoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2B910790530D483F8126FFAFF3C6882E@erratique.ch \
    --to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=francois.bobot@cea.fr \
    --cc=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).