From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1C47EC6E for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:57:14 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYBAEPw01JKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABahxe2b4EmDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQEDASNLCwULCxgCAiMDAgJGARAGEwiHdAgEqg2aeBeBKY0rMweCbzWBEwSeRReOfg X-IPAS-Result: AuYBAEPw01JKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABahxe2b4EmDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQEDASNLCwULCxgCAiMDAgJGARAGEwiHdAgEqg2aeBeBKY0rMweCbzWBEwSeRReOfg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,653,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="44608340" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2014 14:57:13 +0100 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (225-225.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.225.225]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3EA26EE035; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:57:06 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Gabriel Scherer Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Bobot?= , caml users Message-ID: <2B910790530D483F8126FFAFF3C6882E@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: References: <20140111152357.GB28133@notk.org> <20140111154146.GA976@lenat> <20140113090444.GA8904@notk.org> <52D3B71B.40802@cea.fr> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Doing compiler patch review with a dedicated mailing-list Le lundi, 13 janvier 2014 =C3=A0 14:26, Gabriel Scherer a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Daniel B=C3=BCnzli > wrote: > > It's not only easy to browse, it's *great* to browse: all the web-based= mailing list archives I interact with are not even able to follow a thread= running across two month. I really feel we're in 2014. >=20=20 > This is a bit too snarky for me to guess what you want. Regarding what I want, I think #6052 is pretty clear, as is its resolution,= which I perfectly understand: it's up to the dev team to choose the tools = and workflows that suit them. But what I wanted to say is: if you are going= to change your practice, at least, don't replace it by something that seem= s more broken (at least to me) than what we currently have. Best, Daniel