From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q28GatVv029643 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:36:56 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMDAPzeWE9KN1ZKlWdsb2JhbABChGxWsAoBAQEBCQsJCRIpggoBAQQBDBdWBQsJAhoCGA4CAj0KEAYbh30FBK0AikuBL44pM2MEmxeNKg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,552,1325458800"; d="scan'208";a="148286527" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2012 17:36:50 +0100 Received: from heyho.local (53-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.234.53]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC18220A5C71; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:36:48 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:36:46 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Dimino?= Cc: caml-list Message-ID: <2BC2638DE3FA453FA8895253AAD1F32C@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: <20120308170947.4847d3b3@caladan.esterel-technologies.com> References: <1991A512A37E49ACA5AAD30A38D628BF@erratique.ch> <20120308170947.4847d3b3@caladan.esterel-technologies.com> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.5 (build 1043.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id q28GatVv029643 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] oasis packaging questions Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 17:09, Jérémie Dimino a écrit : > Note that in general it is better to install a cma/cmxa, even if your > library has only one module. The reason is that when building an > executable, cmo/cmx files passed on the command line are always linked, > while unused units of cma/cmxa files are not (unless you specify > -linkall). Okay, but is there a reasonable case (beyond sloppy dependency tracking) where you'd like to link against a *single module* library while not wanting to use it ? Daniel