From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386427ED67
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:13:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.214.54;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com";
  x-sender="benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.54 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.54;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com";
  x-sender="benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-bk0-f54.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.214.54;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-bk0-f54.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmsCAIoTJlDRVdY2k2dsb2JhbABEhTq0NwgiAQEBAQkJCwkUBCOCIAEBAQMBEgImBgEBNwEECwsLAyYSNAEFARwGNYdbAQMGBgSZOgkDimaELwEFhQ0KQA2JSAaLDxSFPWCVTo4yPoQAgVQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,749,1336341600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="169643819"
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 11 Aug 2012 10:13:58 +0200
Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so1101226bkc.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        bh=ZrhgkSzxHd798AY+tfPywG9As8YJuP12ulXKb1UK9l0=;
        b=piCYcsdwkbyCNCJSpxWz+J7t2DKl/YRQ+JGlPxyfHPwADGjlMT+bkZpnpIa/G7qVIt
         NA7TmjnitKa7gyukxi7ViS8SRnTDLJ0Hy/5n7runh81lT4kWtNTAAceu5nZ6lweaLyA/
         oBBjgo7dDHFrsjgb/hOAhuox2jQGaaEKgcdG/0Z1wjVyTEv3bepCUn4N63Xs3Eu+/Y0k
         GGi8rRcmvH6LN/uJ0lx49L6ONDsLMTbl+89akBYrFs4T+gCjvyGK8WbHD1k5hDF327+q
         FcAAvkPDF8lBWhfyKxJrO5+lEuGVm2I5ORdZgae0EBgzFIXQt7fgGI6vsWge+FK6ZzUg
         Cxpg==
Received: by 10.205.129.17 with SMTP id hg17mr2111541bkc.88.1344672838426;
        Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tatooine.in.benediktmeurer.de (sign-4db6014b.pool.mediaWays.net. [77.182.1.75])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm366505bkw.15.2012.08.11.01.13.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEE012FC-518B-4F89-9992-69E0958BF8CE@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:13:56 +0200
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2FFC6735-76BE-426E-80CD-73CE529FF3FA@gmail.com>
References: <51E93001-B3AB-4B8D-B46C-7ACA11346C38@psellos.com> <EEE012FC-518B-4F89-9992-69E0958BF8CE@gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Scofield <jeffsco@psellos.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ARM code generator problem


On Aug 11, 2012, at 10:00 , Benedikt Meurer wrote:

> If possible, it would probably also make sense to merge some of the iOS r=
elated code into the upstream ARM backend, in case you are interested.

Looking through the arm-as-to-ios script you published, I could merge most =
of the label, symbol addressing and jump table related code. BTW you're scr=
ipt isn't going to work for large compilation units, because the range of t=
he LDR instruction is limited and you always allocate the pool at the end o=
f the file.

greets,
Benedikt=