From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nilekim@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBA6BC48
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 03:14:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3A1ETMg019848
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 03:14:29 +0200
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so1487440wra
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=jT+i52Q/NkUasUPV2oZ/pixpRTDbd2OcFy9TS7keQ75jjDYpG1CD1OA6uf6v+8Rtxutr5kbA+0XountPcw17rzyER65voKO6xQv5F6DmhyAa2KfT/f1pmGaL0H+U9IxCNbhgZ9q+c0VCCodggMY01zhWQYN71yx79XM47QJPQlE=
Received: by 10.54.46.7 with SMTP id t7mr2537958wrt;
        Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.80.17 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 18:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2a1a1a0c0504091814876c24a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:14:28 -0400
From: Mike Lin <nilekim@gmail.com>
Reply-To: mlin@mlin.net
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: float precision on AMD64
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42587DF5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ...:98 floats:01 ints:01 int:01 float:03 float:03 epsilon:04 folks:05 max:05 max:05 wider:05 seem:07 machine:08 but:12 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi folks,

ints are appropriately wider on AMD64 ocaml, but floats don't seem to
be...max_float and epsilon_float are the same on my 64-bit machine as
on a 32-bit, while max_int is larger. Is this by design?