From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nilekim@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37584BC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed,  1 Jul 2009 16:02:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoCAL8IS0rRVdSumWdsb2JhbACYST8BAQEBAQgLCgcTpC2BGpBlAQMCBIQMBQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,323,1243807200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="42756054"
Received: from mail-vw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2009 16:02:50 +0200
Received: by vwj4 with SMTP id 4so397711vwj.1
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=XuiBk9oLcCmBrQYQ3TZC/1T9dla25poOM8JW37zMC3M=;
        b=SsG/mZRFLoqiXq3wzfGj1ScXdiHxdPDgLBsTYyTCuhXidrizane76m06gCMJ7Orqfm
         o0vmyYEOQw8VBiz5s3SiwD725OQq1YwQOMmKv+dybr5C3WxCPHe+Rsz8xKLcztC5TFaA
         Xukd8tRZjK+VlLY9hk/Ud7Db3jWv98pXtK2Sg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=opfPRNVDKQBwGkRck6exomy8lOcQVG7xBCuywxNQ7/YLXGl3WdP4ePiqK+4e7ptTBi
         ZGKqzfQ/p5TSl6/cJcT+cYmzhWRJF4z4Y6S+AhDcIFSGfHN7a9o9gx5FZxCi+Bj8cIj9
         tCS1hqKmzn2H+yrX/fDmk796V3Mr8+51S+M7I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.90.3 with SMTP id g3mr6791129vcm.20.1246456968795; Wed, 01 
	Jul 2009 07:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C9178E58-587B-47CA-A649-4019AB230FAD@mpi-sws.org>
References: <7d8707de0906110557n6a1511a2k9f4f00827f954cb6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A310A5B.9010404@ens-lyon.org>
	 <7d8707de0906120120x10cc8fe0p54adbd189003f3da@mail.gmail.com>
	 <FBA1153F-776B-47FF-B267-22504D045671@mpi-sws.org>
	 <E47AC31E-BF02-4440-A0BD-EB4B2D90182A@research.att.com>
	 <1750DDE9-4FC6-4657-9687-58240F520A70@mpi-sws.org>
	 <2a1a1a0c0906301913t1dce3eebie91c7cc94f015481@mail.gmail.com>
	 <C9178E58-587B-47CA-A649-4019AB230FAD@mpi-sws.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:02:48 -0400
Message-ID: <2a1a1a0c0907010702u19ad7ba6kd831a71fa1b7f2a5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamllex and python-style indentation
From: Mike Lin <nilekim@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>
Cc: Yitzhak Mandelbaum <yitzhak@research.att.com>,
	Andrej Bauer <Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com>, caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamllex:01 rossberg:01 rossberg:01 haskell:01 lexer:01 2009:98 wrote:01 andreas:01 caml-list:01 parentheses:01 lex:01 match:02 btw:03 indentation:04 nested:04 

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Andreas Rossberg<rossberg@mpi-sws.org> wrot=
e:
>
> I know.=A0(Haskell has nested comments, too, btw.)=A0That does not make a
> difference, though - it is all handled by lex already. In fact, my code
> handled nested comments just fine.

OK, now I'm curious :) how does your lexer match balanced parentheses,
or in this case comments?