From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194FBBBAF for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:01:33 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0CAPkYu0rRVdS/kWdsb2JhbACCJTCOdYh4PwEBAQEJCwoHEwOqIIExj2sBAwIEhBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,445,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="34913927" Received: from mail-vw0-f191.google.com ([209.85.212.191]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2009 16:01:24 +0200 Received: by vws29 with SMTP id 29so1093147vws.15 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+9UJhQQSYF7nIcdxNkq12ZHyRE2J81fEX7gGrXQr+Xw=; b=u7IiU9oyaS4Co0TAWUHjzxN1PSeNKaG8Pur9cYBAVYcc3VXKgOZ3cRTGjJ/HrWvmdQ uGGnywmkInZhjqCb3d0XYGc+SvY8vDhA3RDNpUBKsDwZ+iJVuTC8bhWLVnArrVA67KNW nkC2PBLsbRkCiNIbPi+cfAw41732AMhRpzAQY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ENWaqqoju1/Tf+UxdxSEKsSHqXOdPGenc1bonpXpt2E3p+6Ytq7XjlQXae7Pd28z3W eQ7vTXtd9x6OwBEuL6phw0e5xi5L92JnJfuVmk52Cns2OtF2AIkLFIhX+yG4smkH+oh+ b4Jqc0KbPEJGpRANNqkYLnV5TETCar4c+KOgc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.19.199 with SMTP id c7mr6015582vcb.84.1253800553601; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:55:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090924123940.GA16175@usha.takhisis.invalid> References: <200909240247.17560.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <60112.70.26.45.183.1253786457.squirrel@pegasus.carleton.ca> <200909241252.24209.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20090924123940.GA16175@usha.takhisis.invalid> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:55:53 -0400 Message-ID: <2a1a1a0c0909240655s7d2b259bo7cc84076701f3395@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OC4MC : OCaml for Multicore architectures From: Mike Lin To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646da3a9ddd24047453306f X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 zacchiroli:01 zack:01 ocaml:01 backtrace:01 zacchiroli:01 zack:01 backtrace:01 2009:98 2009:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 exception:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 --00163646da3a9ddd24047453306f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > So, the real question is: is OC4MC going to be ported to mainline OCaml > and support in the future or not? Recalling how mainline had us waiting like 5 years for native exception backtraces, and then another like 3 years for the ability to access the backtrace within the program, I most certainly hope NOT :) (Nothing personal to INRIA, I work on academic projects and well know how these things go, it's just not the most awesome maintenance schedule for one's main PL) --00163646da3a9ddd24047453306f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stefano= Zacchiroli <zack@d= ebian.org> wrote:

So, the real question is: is OC4MC going to be ported to mainline OCaml
and support in the future or not?

Recalling how mainl= ine had us waiting like 5 years for native exception backtraces, and then a= nother like 3 years for the ability to access the backtrace within the prog= ram, I most certainly hope NOT :)
(Nothing personal to INRIA, I work on academic projects and well know= how these things go, it's just not the most awesome maintenance schedu= le for one's main PL)
--00163646da3a9ddd24047453306f--