From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481E180143 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=anil@recoil.org; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=anil@recoil.org; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@bark.recoil.org Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of anil@recoil.org) identity=pra; client-ip=5.153.225.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="anil@recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of anil@recoil.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=5.153.225.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="anil@recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@bark.recoil.org) identity=helo; client-ip=5.153.225.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="postmaster@bark.recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AGxvC1B1H3Se/tJKssmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8Z?= =?us-ascii?q?seISIvad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96KtbQZ1KKW6/mmAj1fp87Z8TgrS99laVwssY?= =?us-ascii?q?Yso0QYGsmLCEn2frbBThcRO4B8bmJj5GyxKkNPGczzNBX4q3y26iMOSF2kbVIm?= =?us-ascii?q?buv6FZTPgMupyuu854PcYxlShDq6fLh+MAi6oR/fu8QSgIZuMKY8xxnUqXdMZ+?= =?us-ascii?q?ha2HlkKFyXkhv+/Mu84IJv/yFNsP896sBMVrn3cKs/QbFEFjoqNHw76tP2vhfZ?= =?us-ascii?q?VwuP4XUcUmQSkhVWBgXO8Q/3UJTsvCbkr+RxwCaVM9H4QrAyQjSi8rxkSAT0hy?= =?us-ascii?q?cdNj4263/Yh8pth69Guh2hphh/w4nJYIGJMfd1Y63Qcc8GSWdHQ81cTDJKDJ+i?= =?us-ascii?q?YIQTDuoBJedYoJf7p1sSthu1GA2gCPryxjNUmnP62Ks32PkjHw7bxgwtB84Bv3?= =?us-ascii?q?vJotv1NqgcX++7wqrGzTvdaP1bwiv96JHNchw9ofGAQax8fMzMwkcvDQPFiVCQ?= =?us-ascii?q?pJT5MjOT1+QNt3WQ4e16Wu2yi24osR9xrSK3xsgyl4bGm4IUwU3D+CpjxoY1JN?= =?us-ascii?q?m4RVVhYdG6DJRQsCCaN49sTsMlWWFotz83x7sbspC1eygKzY4oxx/Za/GfboeH?= =?us-ascii?q?/AnsVOeLLjd+nn5lf6i/hxm0/EO9yeP8TtG53VZQoiZYktTBuGoB2wLN5sWHUP?= =?us-ascii?q?dw/lqt1S6S2w3X5exIO0I5mbTBJ5I8w7M9l4AfvVrFEyTrgkv5lrWWeV8h+uWw?= =?us-ascii?q?6+TofLHmppiEOoBvkA7+KKcultalAesmLgcOWGmb+eCm2L3k5035T61Gjvwwkq?= =?us-ascii?q?bHrJDXPcQWqrSkDwJV3Isv8QizAymm3dgCnXQLMUpJeBedgIjoP1HOLur4DfC6?= =?us-ascii?q?g1m0ijhrwfHGPrn6D5XXMHfMjLDhfbd560JGzwoz199f64pOCr4dOPLzRlPxtN?= =?us-ascii?q?vAAxAlKQO0xuLnBMx51oMfQmKPHrSUMLjSsF+N/uIgOfOAZI4TuDbnKvgq/eTi?= =?us-ascii?q?jXEjmQxVQa78/ZYRZGq5HbxMJEKcKS7sj9ENC2YJlhY5VOvrzkWFVicVbHG3Cf?= =?us-ascii?q?ES/DY+XaugDIOLY4mhgLWf1T+2EpFHLjRPDFGIOW3lfIKFX7ELci3EcZwpqSAN?= =?us-ascii?q?SbX0E9xp7hqprgKvjuM/duc=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DqAgDgZzFZ/zPhmQVdGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBFgEBAQMBAQEJAQEBgyxigQ2Of5BlIZgLKIV8AgiCc0MUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQF?= =?us-ascii?q?qKIIzJAGCQQEFOgYDASoLAQEOCxguVwYTii4BC64BgxCDCQcCiD8BAQEBAQUBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBARQBAwWIQSsLgmmEaoNBgjGeNIchjApsgRqFPIo4kBaERjYhgQq?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQhGEgGCYYQSdYlzAQEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DqAgDgZzFZ/zPhmQVdGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBFgEBAQMBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?JAQEBgyxigQ2Of5BlIZgLKIV8AgiCc0MUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFqKIIzJAGCQQEFO?= =?us-ascii?q?gYDASoLAQEOCxguVwYTii4BC64BgxCDCQcCiD8BAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBAQEBARQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAwWIQSsLgmmEaoNBgjGeNIchjApsgRqFPIo4kBaERjYhgQqBAQhGEgGCYYQSd?= =?us-ascii?q?YlzAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,285,1493676000"; d="scan'208";a="227119630" Received: from bark.recoil.org ([5.153.225.51]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jun 2017 15:31:04 +0200 Received: from bark.recoil.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bark.recoil.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 314c1be4; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:31:02 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=recoil.org; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= selector1; bh=SfKF7F6yBOFiUqROwInLPQCWG3Q=; b=VbIrywZwNF0MJ1zkTF QWPJJOoRKW5A3YtTFG8AiWKnuczoGRe1ai9mN4iM0YLU794fFEKJmqQNRAMaynIR IMJMd/ENjXQNyxv/iJaRzk2Xkc7rcaXlcsTjNBZVNG87+GU+cWfK5mvw/fevEBBZ facfVvEIm0myUYzaqDc4Wffvo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=recoil.org; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=akZz8m95mygYw6UXxqLjtI2bGXcEZl3J4a1JYAPAY+ge8rvgOSO zmaVPIuUOARO1yDgUqpcSH6+kw0q5y8492K9htuJwZKBIYubC3YFSVemhh6EuTkW vUS6Rl9NQy+YERi8Lyn2+/X+a2t8Ojrl6Ao9s2jocMEiHoSot6vqzOG4= Received: from speck.cam.docker.com (mail.astons-coaches.co.uk [194.72.166.2]) by bark.recoil.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 64a7c113 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:31:02 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: <20170602121630.GA30172@topoi.pooq.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:31:01 +0100 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <307A8D8C-0840-4C7D-9722-15748B71D4CF@recoil.org> References: <810984CC-EA48-49A7-A00C-7127E824B9DA@recoil.org> <20170602121630.GA30172@topoi.pooq.com> To: Hendrik Boom X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [rfc] deprecating opam 1.2.0 On 2 Jun 2017, at 13:16, Hendrik Boom wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:09:37AM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >>=20 >> ### Who is still using opam 1.2.0? >>=20 >> I found that the Debian Jessie (stable) release includes 1.2.0, and this= is probably the last major distribution including it. The [Debian Stretch= ](https://wiki.debian.org/DebianStretch) is due to become the stable releas= e on the 17th June 2017, and so at that point there will hopefully be no di= stributions actively sending opam 1.2.0 out. >>=20 >> Is there anyone else that is still packaging 1.2.0? Please comment here= if so, and we should move them away. >=20 > Yes. There's Devuan stable. It is Debian without systemd, and it=20 > will take a while for it to catch up when Debian relabels their=20 > releases.=20=20 >=20 > I'll ask about it on the devuan mailing list. Perhaps they can=20 > accelerate the opam-related packages. I don't know whether that will=20 > be compatible with their automated workflow. Thanks for checking, Hendrik. It may be worth mentioning to them that OPAM 1.2.0 is already broken in practical terms (unless the repository it defaults to is rolled back), and so we encourage backports to 1.2.2 in this case. regards, Anil=