From: Dave Berry <dave@kal.com>
To: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
Cc: Markus Mottl <mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>, OCAML <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Unicode (was RE: JIT-compilation for OCaml?)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:58:53 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3145774E67D8D111BE6E00C0DF418B663AD720@nt.kal.com> (raw)
I thought Unicode was a recognised subset of ISO-10646, corresponding to the
range 0-2^16. Also, don't Windows NT/2000 use Unicode?
My knowledge of C/C++ is probably out of date, but I thought they just used
the wide character type, without requiring a particular internal
representation. In what way do ISO C/C++ support ISO-10646?
(I realise this isn't directly on-topic, but it may be relevant for future
extensions to OCaml?)
Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Max Skaller [mailto:skaller@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:01
To: Dave Berry
Cc: Markus Mottl; OCAML
Subject: Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
Dave Berry wrote:
>
> This view seems extreme to me. Certainly the Java type system has faults
--
> lack of generics being one, lack of enumerated types another, and various
> other points as well. But surely Unicode is a useful de facto standard?
No. Unicode was abandoned years ago: there is an 'offical'
ISO Standard: ISO-10646. There are 2^31 code points, unlike
Unicode's 2^16, which is already barely adequate. ISO C and ISO C++
support ISO-10646. Linux runs ISO-10646 (via UTF-8).
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-11 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-11 12:58 Dave Berry [this message]
2001-01-11 18:49 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-01-12 9:24 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-12 12:05 ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
[not found] ` <3A5F7685.FF2593BB@snob.spb.ru>
2001-01-12 21:33 ` Nickolay Semyonov
2001-01-17 19:47 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-12 0:19 ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
2001-01-17 19:37 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-18 17:49 ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
2001-01-22 20:27 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-22 21:44 ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
2001-01-24 13:41 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-12 8:33 ` John Max Skaller
[not found] ` <3A5F77B7.52D8F933@snob.spb.ru>
2001-01-12 21:33 ` Nickolay Semyonov
2001-01-12 21:25 ` Nickolay Semyonov
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.00.10101222155260.697-100000@carlotta.cli.di.unipi .it>
2001-01-22 21:57 ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3145774E67D8D111BE6E00C0DF418B663AD720@nt.kal.com \
--to=dave@kal.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at \
--cc=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).