From: Grumpy <grumpy@drno.eu>
To: "Nicolás Ojeda Bär" <nicolas.ojeda.bar@lexifi.com>
Cc: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Type inference curiosity
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:13:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <317e04aa-de79-bf61-e1fd-f4d467b5a484@drno.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADK7aFNAqdXY6CMp7=ce=AzCs33PRzooVF+kR3P6Gfj5fziMNQ@mail.gmail.com>
This does not explain why the compiler accepts as well typed the
function eval2, after inferring a = int from the first branch.
Do I miss something ?
Le 24/03/2017 à 10:55, Nicolás Ojeda Bär a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Recursive definitions need to be explicitly annotated to be
> polymorphic. The (type a) annotation
> introduces an abstract type a in the body of the function but does not
> make it polymorphic.
> The annotation type a. on the other hand, does both.
>
> See http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/extn.html#sec227
> <http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/extn.html#sec227> for the
> details.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Grumpy <grumpy@drno.eu
> <mailto:grumpy@drno.eu>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think there is an incoherency or a bug somewhere in the type inference
> engine with the following code with version 4.02.3 (I have not tested in
> previous versions). Both functions eval and eval2 are identical but the
> inferred types are different, and the type inferred for eval2 is
> actually wrong.
>
> The function eval is typed correcly ('a exp -> 'a) while the type
> inferred for funcion function eval2 is (int exp -> int), which is wrong
> because of the Inc case returning ('a exp -> 'a).
>
> It seems the syntax (type a) leads to this incorrect behaviour...
>
>
> type _ exp =
> | Stop : int exp
> | Inc : (int exp -> int) exp
>
> let rec eval : type a. a exp -> a = function
> | Stop -> 0
> | Inc -> (fun (p : int exp) -> 1 + eval p)
>
> let rec eval2 (type a) (p : a exp) : a =
> match p with
> | Stop -> 0
> | Inc -> (fun (p : int exp) -> 1 + eval2 p)
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> <https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list>
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners>
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> <http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-24 9:20 Grumpy
2017-03-24 9:55 ` Nicolás Ojeda Bär
2017-03-24 10:13 ` Grumpy [this message]
2017-03-28 3:11 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=317e04aa-de79-bf61-e1fd-f4d467b5a484@drno.eu \
--to=grumpy@drno.eu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=nicolas.ojeda.bar@lexifi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).