From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA647EEAF
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:02:36 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnoBADu19VBKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABFgy6DDLQDg18OAQEBAQEICQsJFCeCHwEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4gRBKYOgkCOf4EjjwIyYQObZBONVA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,475,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="168576953"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2013 21:02:35 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (117-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.234.117])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D1F2086A0B;
	Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:02:33 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:02:30 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas@ocamlpro.com>
Cc: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>, OCaml mailing-list
 <caml-list@inria.fr>, Mirage List <cl-mirage@lists.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <32663755125844939AE6DD248CD6462A@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <3764589D-EC12-4CD5-A76F-A009BE2DDE8E@ocamlpro.com>
References: <6833F17C-B642-4ED9-8C8F-2665A9742845@ocamlpro.com>
 <A50624F5-9601-492C-84E1-D2D54081AB0E@recoil.org>
 <3764589D-EC12-4CD5-A76F-A009BE2DDE8E@ocamlpro.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] beta-release of OPAM

Le mardi, 15 janvier 2013 =C3=A0 17:17, Thomas Gazagnaire a =C3=A9crit :
> To people already using OPAM, I forgot to mention that it is highly recom=
mended to NOT upgrade opam using opam. The auto-update thing was a mistake =
at the first place. It is also advised to start from a fresh opam init. It =
should work if you don't, but it would definitely avoid some confusions in =
some corner-cases.

But we agree there's no problem in compiling the new opam binary with an op=
am install remove ~/.opam and then restart with a fresh init with the new b=
inary ?=20=20

Best,

Daniel