From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FE9BB84 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:20:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from m14s26.vip-server.net (m14s26.vip-server.net [193.138.181.188]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5T9KA86032179 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:20:15 +0200 Received: from [?D?????????0???$IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m14s26.vip-server.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E894F8924A; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:11:23 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <005801c69b5d$1d39d130$ae5ab33e@piotrgqd2wjase> References: <200606281050.k5SAo4ee008939@nez-perce.inria.fr> <86804392-80E8-4968-89CC-6ECDF6DC128A@informatik.uni-kl.de> <005801c69b5d$1d39d130$ae5ab33e@piotrgqd2wjase> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <32AEEABB-2933-43E2-B9DC-8F007A6F7ACE@informatik.uni-kl.de> Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Jean-Marie Gaillourdet Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Retyping module to a new signature Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:20:31 +0200 To: Piotr Wieczorek X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44A39B4A.009 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hash:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 signatures:01 modules:01 modules:01 consistent:02 module:03 module:03 library:03 rename:04 retyping:04 darwin:04 pgp:05 pgp:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 29.06.2006, at 11:19, Piotr Wieczorek wrote: > Well, imagine following situation I got program as bunch of =20 > bytecompiled modules. Some of them are third-party libraries. =20 > Thereis new version of library released with compatible but not =20 > necessary identical signatures. > I want now to have module with identical name as source module but =20 > consistent with new signature. > Using Your method, I think, I cannot use the name name of new =20 > module as of the source module. It might be easier to rename the bytecompiled modules and combine it =20 with my method. Just my 0,02=E2=82=AC. Regards, Jean-Marie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEo5tfNIUNP/I5YOgRAvqiAJ9Q/zYMIOra6VeMAU80DQGYox4KVQCgg/qs XjPahe+Un/tYuH8aIMFGlHI=3D =3DmjyC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----