From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC22BB83 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:09:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from m14s26.vip-server.net (m14s26.vip-server.net [193.138.181.188]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6J89VDt010986 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:09:36 +0200 Received: from [?Q???????????s?$IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m14s26.vip-server.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F355C89039; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:59:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <304169FE-8DD8-4765-9AF1-A943C5293EEB@gmail.com> References: <304169FE-8DD8-4765-9AF1-A943C5293EEB@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <345AE3A7-B1C3-495E-839F-BD343FF487C2@gaillourdet.net> Cc: caml-list Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jean-Marie Gaillourdet Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Cocoa bindings (again) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:09:59 +0200 To: Joel Reymont X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 44BDE8BB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bindings:01 hash:01 bindings:01 parsing:01 swig:01 parsing:01 swig:01 ocaml:01 cocoa:98 cocoa:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 darwin:04 pgp:05 pgp:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 18.07.2006, at 23:38, Joel Reymont wrote: > Folks, > > I would like to tinker with Cocoa bindings and try to move that > project forward. > > Where should I start from? I would like to take the route of > parsing Obj-C header files. The swig manual states that they support experimentally Objective-C parsing. Swig is a wrapper generator with an OCaml backend. So this might be a starting point :-) Regards, Jean-Marie PS: I don't have any experience with swig myself, therefore I don't claim that it is really good. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEvejdNIUNP/I5YOgRAlczAJ0VSNF58STHKC2TYTh20npVmTTLWQCfeUP+ ewIbhrUog9FVwuulMfA+evc= =7pR1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----