* Standard ML. A comparison with CAML
@ 1998-05-21 12:39 Dan Arghirescu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dan Arghirescu @ 1998-05-21 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Bonjour a toutes ...
Hi everybody ...
I was assigned to write a short essay upon this. I used CAML (I've found
it particulary interesting), but I had no interaction with SML at all.
I wonder if there are any papers on "SML <-> CAML" - what one has, that
the other doesn't, which one is better, and in what way(s). I was given
(avec haleine, je crois) as documentation Polsen's "Standard ML" and
another book (also about 400 pages) of Functional Programming.
Any pointers on this would be greatly appreciated ...
Thank you very much,
Merci beaucoup,
Dan Arghirescu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1998-05-21 18:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-05-21 12:39 Standard ML. A comparison with CAML Dan Arghirescu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).