From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA07223 for caml-redistribution; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:42:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA07862 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:04:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from landsraad.net (caladan.arrakis.es [195.5.65.34]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA19120 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:04:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from ind-cr.uclm.es (ib-6.arrakis.es [195.5.71.6]) by landsraad.net (8.9.2+/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA21347 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:06:41 +0100 (MET) Sender: weis Message-ID: <36A9D5F0.F9215F45@ind-cr.uclm.es> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:00:16 +0100 From: Juan Jose Garcia Ripoll X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.34 i686) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Size of arrays References: <199901221921.UAA10085@pauillac.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi I've noticed that OCaml imposes a very small upper limit in the size of arrays: 8Mb or so, I think. Can this limit be modified somehow? [Please do not answer that I'm not choosing the right data structure because I work in numerical analysis and here we need large vectors of at least floating point type -- complex would also be nice, though] Regards Juanjo