From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3024F7FCCB
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 21:25:42 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CIAAA3vBVVm0pWN0pcg1iDbcJChXUCggYBAQEBAQERAQEBAQEICQsJFC6EFQEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4gnBAmyN5oZAQEBBwEBAQEBGQSBIYoHhEUzB4JoL4EWBZRGjHcPjSyEEYMxAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A0CIAAA3vBVVm0pWN0pcg1iDbcJChXUCggYBAQEBAQERAQEBAQEICQsJFC6EFQEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4gnBAmyN5oZAQEBBwEBAQEBGQSBIYoHhEUzB4JoL4EWBZRGjHcPjSyEEYMxAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,480,1422918000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="130474924"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2015 21:25:41 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (80.226.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.197.226.80])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E7B20E2E61;
	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:24:37 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 21:24:26 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: "Mr. Herr" <misterherr@freenet.de>
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <36D041EEA2094E45AB2BB6BA1C2C37F5@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <5515B4F8.3070205@freenet.de>
References: <2162350.aHZvdojE6Q@agaric> <55159AD3.7050507@freenet.de>
 <ECC38980-73C8-48DA-9A65-32F33A7D015E@recoil.org>
 <5515A183.3020709@freenet.de>
 <CAMu2m2LydS9TcK1vaDDhJLKNn=OrkvVed5dYABxz3TafyRmZSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5515B4F8.3070205@freenet.de>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM 1.2.1

Le vendredi, 27 mars 2015 =C3=A0 20:52, Mr. Herr a =C3=A9crit :
> I would have voted against the unicode graphics,=20=20

There's no voting process but you can disable them, see:=20=20
=20=20
https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/2065#issuecomment-83232580

Btw. Louis I think the two level scheme is a little bit overkill and more c=
omplex that it should be, you should really keep it to a single variable. T=
hat two-level mechanism seem to have been design to work around issues in O=
S level support for unicode glyphs and it doesn't sound like a good idea. A=
lso the description of OPAMUTF8 is misleading, UTF-8 characters may be outp=
ut since opam files are UTF-8 encoded and AFAIK you don't transcode any out=
put of the tool to ASCII when OPAMUTF8 is `never` (e.g. opam file messages:=
 fields).=20=20

Best,

Daniel