From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F70E7F767
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AscNAI4vsVNKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABag1+CJ4EhwmsBgSMPAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiEBAEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4g6BAmqS5whF4ErjSkzB4J3NoEWBaFNF5A6
X-IPAS-Result: AscNAI4vsVNKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABag1+CJ4EhwmsBgSMPAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiEBAEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4g6BAmqS5whF4ErjSkzB4J3NoEWBaFNF5A6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,574,1400018400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="82895250"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2014 11:37:50 +0200
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (188.29.165.194.threembb.co.uk [188.29.165.194])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA5120E1E74;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:37:43 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <36D932F6570F44299DFA43CE015B51B9@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20140630082514.GA17024@frosties>
References: <94E1372FFFCE40BF87C5F09286E6C3FA@erratique.ch>
 <20140630082514.GA17024@frosties>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Uucp 0.9.0

Le lundi, 30 juin 2014 =C3=A0 09:25, Goswin von Brederlow a =C3=A9crit :
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUCP
>=20=20
> Maybe not the best name.
I think you are a little bit short sighted.

1) The UUCP protocol suite is now mostly a historical artefact

2) The library is called uucp and the module Uucp, not UUCP, just don=E2=80=
=99t apply Unicode=E2=80=99s canonical caseless matching algorithm and you =
will be able to distinguish...

3) Uucp as a name perfectly fits among the names of my modular implementati=
on of Unicode (Uucd, Uutf, Uunf and more in the future)

4) Given the structure of the library and the way it=E2=80=99s going to be =
used in code, I doubt it will cause any confusion among people reading code=
 that uses the library (recurse to point 1)).

Best,

Daniel