From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA29888 for caml-redistribution; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 19:19:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA01466 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:51:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.nap.com.ar (mail.nap.com.ar [209.14.116.11]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA19638 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:51:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [200.41.180.73] (HELO k-bell.com) by mail.nap.com.ar (Stalker SMTP Server 1.8b3) with ESMTP id S.0002720142; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:51:28 -0300 Message-ID: <37C57E9B.97524197@k-bell.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:51:28 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mat=EDas?= Giovannini Reply-To: matias@k-bell.com Organization: Script S.A. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,es-AR,es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Skaller CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: bignums? References: <3.0.6.32.19990824131900.009a26a0@mail.triode.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis John Skaller wrote: > I need an Ocaml multiple precision arithmetic package. > I'd like to try using an existing interface if possible, Why not use Ocaml's own Bigints, or Nats if you need all the speed the low-level implemetation gives you? You may need to link a special top-level with libnums.a. As far as I know, Ocaml's underlying implementation is faster than GMP, older, stabler and more complete. -- I got your message. I couldn't read it. It was a cryptogram. -- Laurie Anderson