From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA19694 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:39:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA25753 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:25:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from ruby (krusty117.zip.com.au [61.8.16.117]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA20887 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:24:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from maxtal.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ruby (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA02600 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 06:26:45 +1100 Sender: weis Message-ID: <3863C8F2.CF466591@maxtal.com.au> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 06:26:42 +1100 From: skaller Organization: Maxtal X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: GC: object limits Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmmm: if ocaml uses a byte index to 4K blocks, doesn't that limit the number of objects to 256K? [assuming 4 byte words] -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia homepage: http://www.maxtal.com.au/~skaller voice: 61-2-9660-0850