From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA16997 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:48:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA03101 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:44:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from ruby (kenny82.zip.com.au [61.8.18.210]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA16916 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:44:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from maxtal.com.au (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ruby (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA21541 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:45:39 +1100 Sender: weis Message-ID: <38B1A3F3.9C5FB24B@maxtal.com.au> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:45:39 +1100 From: skaller Organization: Maxtal X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Portability of applications written in OCAML References: <14505.19990.196972.627775@sun-demons> <00021700444302.30469@ice> <20000218103603.51298@pauillac.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xavier Leroy wrote: > I think the easiest way to distribute an OCaml application is as > sources, plus binaries for a couple of popular architectures > (typically, Linux/Intel and Windows). Novice users can pick the > binaries, and experienced users should have no problems installing > OCaml for compiling your application. I have no problem compiling Ocaml on my Linux box but I CANNOT do so on my WinNT box -- I don't have a C compiler for Windows [except gcc for Cygwin] -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net